[aspect-devel] aspect release planning

[Timo Heister]

Wolfgang,

I would like to make the 1.2 release soon. What needs to be done in
your opinion? I think all current PRs can wait.

Do you have an idea for a work-around for our failing test? (otherwise
we just disable it for now...)

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at tamu.edu> wrote:
> On 01/14/2015 08:05 PM, Timo Heister wrote:
>>
>> We could also make the new manifold optional and disable it for those
>> two tests. We are not 100% sure that the new way is better in every
>> case. The Q mapping in the interior might be another option too
>> (because it is more expensive).
>
>
> I actually think that the mapping for the sphere is unconditionally better.
> The mesh is just too distorted in the default case and I'd like to at least
> make the new behavior the default.
>
>
> Best
>  W.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wolfgang Bangerth               email:            bangerth at math.tamu.edu
>                                 www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing list
> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel



-- 
Timo Heister
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~heister/