[aspect-devel] inconsistency in use of x, y, and z
Magali Billen
mibillen at ucdavis.edu
Tue Mar 10 10:19:47 PDT 2015
Hello,
I'm working through issue with my undergraduate student, and I just want to point out an inconsistency
that leads to unnecessary confusion. I'm not sure what the fix is however.
In 2D the dimension of the box are set with X extent and Y extent. However, for the initial temperature
function, the variables that need to be used are x and z.
It seems to me that the dimension and axis of the 2D model should be X and Z and that adding the third
dimension should add the Y dimension.
Is there any chance of making this change - or is it just too late??
This is also an issue with the boundary indicators. To easily move from a 2D to a 3D model, the boundary
indicators for left, right, bottom, top should remain 0-3 and adding the third dimension should add the boundary indicators 4 and 5 for the front and back. I know you can get around this by using the words "front", "back", etc...
but this seems like a weird way of counting things
-----------------------------------------------------------
Professor of Geophysics & UCD Chancellor Fellow
Chair, Geology Graduate Program
Earth & Planetary Sciences Dept., UC Davis
Davis, CA 95616
Room 2129 Earth & Physical Sciences Bldg.
Office Phone: (530) 752-4169
http://mygeologypage.ucdavis.edu/billen/
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/aspect-devel/attachments/20150310/9143fc76/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2015-03-10 at 10.13.53 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 50532 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/aspect-devel/attachments/20150310/9143fc76/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Aspect-devel
mailing list