[aspect-devel] internal velocity boundary conditions
Timo Heister
heister at clemson.edu
Tue May 12 18:45:14 PDT 2015
Magali,
this might not quite be what you want, but my student Ryan just
implemented a feature where you can turn off solving for the Stokes
system and supply a given velocity and pressure in the whole domain.
So, if you are able to describe the velocity as a function of the
location, you can run your model like this for a certain amount of
time before you snapshot and switch to a normal computation where
velocity is driven by temperature differences again.
Internal boundary conditions are a bit more complicated, especially
because you need to be careful to pose them in a compatible way.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jonathan Perry-Houts
<jperryh2 at uoregon.edu> wrote:
> I actually had this on my list of hackathon items as well. It would be
> very useful.
>
> On 05/12/2015 05:46 PM, Thorsten Becker wrote:
>> Likewise not at the hackathon myself, but this exact application (for
>> the Tohoku setting) would be of great interest to my group as well...
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Thorsten W Becker
>> geodynamics.usc.edu <http://geodynamics.usc.edu/~becker>
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Magali Billen <mibillen at ucdavis.edu
>> <mailto:mibillen at ucdavis.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Everyone,
>> Unfortunately I’m not going to make it to Hackathon to ask this
>> question in person, but this way everyone
>> can read (ignore?) and hear or contribute to the response.
>>
>> The short form of my question is: Is it possible to define
>> “internal” velocity boundary conditions in Aspect: that is
>> can I fix the velocity at nodes inside the model domain? If the
>> answer is yes, can someone comment on the basic steps
>> that would be needed (e.g., need to flag these nodes as “boundary
>> conditions” so they get handled properly during assembly of the
>> solution matrices, then assign velocities,…).
>>
>> Here is the background for why I ask this question:
>>
>> One of the projects we are starting to develop in Aspect in my group
>> is instantaneous models for a specific
>> subduction zones. The key issue with these models is that we need to
>> define a starting thermal structure
>> that is based on the observed geometry of the subducted plate (e.g.,
>> from seismicity). There are different
>> was to do this, and I’ve done several of them for previous models
>> completed using Citcom.
>>
>> Based on that experience, and given the AMR capabilities of Aspect,
>> I think the best (most accurate and easiest) way to
>> define the starting thermal structure is to run model in which you
>> have defined the surface of the plate
>> INSIDE the model (going down into the mantle) and then define fixed
>> velocities associated with this surface.
>>
>> Note it is not necessary for the elements to conform to this surface
>> (no distortion of the grid), we can use refinement of the grid to
>> get accurate enough for our purposes.
>>
>> Once the velocity conditions inside the mesh are defined together
>> with the normal external boundary conditions and an initial
>> temperature structure for the plates at the actual top of the mesh,
>> then we would run this model forward in time to kinematically
>> “subduct” the plate. This will allow us to create a smooth 3D
>> starting temperature models for our instantaneous dynamically-driven
>> models that follows the observed shape of the slab.
>>
>> In addition to using this capability for the purpose describe above,
>> this would allow Aspect to also run what is commonly referred to as
>> “mantle wedge thermal models”, in which the subducted plate and
>> overriding plates are really used as boundary conditions on the
>> flow/temperature in the mantle between them. These models are
>> commonly used to look at the detailed thermal structure and melting
>> in the mantle wedge.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Magali
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> Professor of Geophysics & UCD Chancellor Fellow
>> Chair, Geology Graduate Program
>> Earth & Planetary Sciences Dept., UC Davis
>> Davis, CA 95616
>> 2129 Earth & Physical Sciences Bldg.
>> Office Phone: (530) 752-4169 <tel:%28530%29%20752-4169>
>> http://mygeologypage.ucdavis.edu/billen/
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aspect-devel mailing list
>> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org <mailto:Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org>
>> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aspect-devel mailing list
>> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
>> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing list
> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
--
Timo Heister
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~heister/
More information about the Aspect-devel
mailing list