[aspect-devel] error: static assertion failed with "typex::value"

[Rene Gassmoeller]

That is good to know. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Rene


On 07/26/2017 07:44 PM, Lev Karatun wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> looks like dealii bug was the problem -- after updating it Aspect
> installed successfully. Thanks a lot!
>
> Best regards,
> Lev Karatun.
>
> 2017-07-26 16:58 GMT-04:00 Rene Gassmoeller
> <rene.gassmoeller at mailbox.org <mailto:rene.gassmoeller at mailbox.org>>:
>
>     I just noticed that I did not send this to the mailing list, but
>     only to Lev directly.
>
>     Before trying to switch your whole build system, give updating
>     deal.II a try. The first error seems definitely related to your
>     deal.II, not the compiler.
>
>     Best,
>
>     Rene
>
>
>
>     Hi Lev,
>
>     About the first error below (the one with the xdmf entry): From
>     when is your version of deal.II? For a brief period over the
>     weekend (Friday to Monday, I think) there was a bug in the deal.II
>     development version (or rather in the way aspect uses some deal.II
>     functionality) causing the first error message (this is fixed
>     now). Maybe updating deal.II will already solve this problem if
>     you use a version from around that time.
>
>     About the second error: I am a bit clueless how to proceed here.
>     It seems like the boost serialization does not work properly.
>     Thinking about it this might be related to the first one (it
>     complains about a incompatibility between 'const' and non 'const'
>     pointer types, which is similar to the problem above).
>
>     Bottom line: If you use a deal.II developer version from some time
>     around the weekend please update and try again. If not let us
>     know, and we can discuss other things to try.
>
>
>     Best,
>
>     Rene
>
>
>     On 07/26/2017 02:54 PM, Timo Heister wrote:
>
>         Lev,
>
>             I tried reinstalling with Intel 17 compilers and bundled
>             Boost -- same
>             error.
>
>         That is too bad but also not very surprising because we do not
>         use/test the intel compilers very much. I will look into this
>         at some
>         point. For now I would go with gcc instead.
>
>
>     -- 
>     Rene Gassmoeller
>     http://www.math.colostate.edu/~gassmoel/
>     <http://www.math.colostate.edu/%7Egassmoel/>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Aspect-devel mailing list
>     Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org <mailto:Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org>
>     http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>     <http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing list
> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel

-- 
Rene Gassmoeller
http://www.math.colostate.edu/~gassmoel/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/aspect-devel/attachments/20170728/7bf9facc/attachment.html>