[aspect-devel] Question on tracers output

[FELIPE ORELLANA ROVIROSA]

 I understand now.

 Thank you Rene,

Felipe

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Rene Gassmoeller <
rene.gassmoeller at mailbox.org> wrote:

> Felipe,
>
> just to be clear: this grouping of particles *is* fully available in the
> current version of ASPECT if you use deal.II 9.0 (either the current
> development version or the release candidate from github). The development
> version of ASPECT (and the release 2.1.0) will likely require this deal.II
> version in some time (probably some time this summer), and yes from then on
> you can always use the grouping, because you have to use the new deal.II
> version.
>
> Best,
>
> Rene
>
> On 05/11/2018 10:52 AM, FELIPE ORELLANA ROVIROSA wrote:
>
> Thanks Rene,
>
>         I see, that is a good one.
>
>         The problem is, that I am trying to install aspect on Stampede2
> and there seems to be an issue with dealii versions other than 8.5.? , John
> Naliboff and I have been dealing with this issue.
>
>          There are different versions of dealii/trilinos and different
> versions of Aspect, and there seem to be some forbidden combinations..
>
>          I guess this grouping of particle files will be fully available
> in future versions of Aspect.
>
> thank you,
> cheers,
> Felipe
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Rene Gassmoeller <
> rene.gassmoeller at mailbox.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Actually, the grouping is already implemented, but it is only available
>> from deal.II 9.0 on, because we needed some new functionality for that
>> (building of 0-dimensional output patches in deal.II). So Felipe if you
>> update to the newest deal.II development version (or wait for a week or
>> so until the release is done), then you can select that parameter.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rene
>>
>>
>> On 05/11/2018 12:45 AM, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>> > On 05/11/2018 03:35 PM, FELIPE ORELLANA ROVIROSA wrote:
>> >>
>> >>   I sometimes need to do these things for example when the I chose an
>> >> output interval that unfortunately was too short (say less than..50
>> >> time steps), so there are too many output files.. (I sometimes
>> >> discover that after 12 hours of running)
>> >>
>> >> Whatever, maybe there is a real good use to the individual vtu files.
>> >> But, as a suggestion, consider adding the grouping option for
>> >> particle files in future Aspect versions.
>> >
>> > I don't think there's a particular good reason other than the fact
>> > that nobody felt strongly enough about the issue to implement this :-)
>> >
>> > Best
>> >  W.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Rene Gassmoeller
>> https://gassmoeller.github.io/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aspect-devel mailing list
>> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
>> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing listAspect-devel at geodynamics.orghttp://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>
>
> --
> Rene Gassmoellerhttps://gassmoeller.github.io/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing list
> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/aspect-devel/attachments/20180511/59cab2fb/attachment-0001.html>