[cig-commits] r12714 - mc/2D/ConMan/trunk/src
sdk at geodynamics.org
sdk at geodynamics.org
Tue Aug 26 11:30:08 PDT 2008
Author: sdk
Date: 2008-08-26 11:30:08 -0700 (Tue, 26 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 12714
Modified:
mc/2D/ConMan/trunk/src/geoid.F
Log:
essageadded explicit instructions for changing code for Blankenback problem
Modified: mc/2D/ConMan/trunk/src/geoid.F
===================================================================
--- mc/2D/ConMan/trunk/src/geoid.F 2008-08-26 13:33:48 UTC (rev 12713)
+++ mc/2D/ConMan/trunk/src/geoid.F 2008-08-26 18:30:08 UTC (rev 12714)
@@ -26,9 +26,14 @@
real geoid1(NWAVE),rtzzt(NWAVE),rtzzb(NWAVE), geoid2(NWAVE)
c
c constants for dimensionalization (geoid and topography in meters)
-c the values used for the Blankenback et al. Benchmark 1a
-c (Ra=1.0e4, constant viscosity)
c
+ pi = 3.14159272e0
+ aratio = x(1,numnp)
+c
+c The values used for the Blankenback et al. Benchmark 1a, 1b, 1c
+c remove the comments from the following eight lines of code and
+c comment out the lines below for the Blankenbach benchmarks
+c
c d = 1.0e6
c g = 1.0e1
c rho = 4.0e3
@@ -38,6 +43,14 @@
c alfa = 2.5e-5
c deltaT = 1.0e3
c
+c The values below are more representative of whole mantle convection
+c values. Notice that this combination of values assumes a specific
+c values of the Rayleigh number. If the input value of the Rayleigh
+c number differs, then these values will not give meaningful geoid
+c and topography values.
+c
+c These lines should be commented out for the Blankenbach problems.
+c
d = 3.000e6
g = 1.0e1
rho = 4.0e3
@@ -46,9 +59,9 @@
bigG = 6.673e-11
alfa = 2.0e-5
deltaT = 2.000e3
- pi = 3.14159272e0
- aratio = x(1,numnp)
c
+c Below here nothing needs to be changed.
+c
c if the problem uses reflecting boundary conditions, this is correct
c we also need to reflect the solution about the right boundary
c to get the correct symmetry.
@@ -197,4 +210,4 @@
c
1001 format(4e15.7)
return
- end
\ No newline at end of file
+ end
More information about the cig-commits
mailing list