[cig-commits] r15772 - doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long
luis at geodynamics.org
luis at geodynamics.org
Mon Oct 5 15:49:27 PDT 2009
Author: luis
Date: 2009-10-05 15:49:26 -0700 (Mon, 05 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 15772
Modified:
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.rst
Log:
Fixes to long/geomod2004.rst
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.html 2009-10-05 22:49:22 UTC (rev 15771)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.html 2009-10-05 22:49:26 UTC (rev 15772)
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@
This value is somewhere in the middle of the range of values used in the
calculations for other codes.</p>
<div class="figure">
-<img alt="images/Extension_setup.pngFigure[fig:Extension-model-setup]Extensionmodelsetup.Reproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]" src="images/Extension_setup.pngFigure[fig:Extension-model-setup]Extensionmodelsetup.Reproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]" />
+<img alt="images/Extension_setup.png" src="images/Extension_setup.png" />
+<p class="caption">Figure [fig:Extension-model-setup]</p>
+<div class="legend">
+Extension model setup. Reproduced, with permission, from Buiter et al.
+[Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox]</div>
</div>
<p>A comparison against the other codes is in Figure
[fig:Comparison-extension]. While it is difficult to perform exact
@@ -42,10 +46,27 @@
details, but, after a certain minimum resolution, does not change the
character of the solution.</p>
<div class="figure">
-<img alt="images/Extension_comparision.png(sp?)Figure[fig:Comparison-extension]Strainrateinvariantforthenumericalextensionmodelsafter5cmofextension.Theresolutionsofthevariousmodelsare:I2ELVIS:$400\times75$LAPEX-2D:$301\times71$Microfem:$201\times61$SloMo:$401\times71$Sopale:$401\times71$Gale:$1024\times128$Uperimagesreproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]." src="images/Extension_comparision.png(sp?)Figure[fig:Comparison-extension]Strainrateinvariantforthenumericalextensionmodelsafter5cmofextension.Theresolutionsofthevariousmodelsare:I2ELVIS:$400\times75$LAPEX-2D:$301\times71$Microfem:$201\times61$SloMo:$401\times71$Sopale:$401\times71$Gale:$1024\times128$Uperimagesreproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]." />
+<img alt="images/Extension_comparision.png" src="images/Extension_comparision.png" />
+<p class="caption">Figure [fig:Comparison-extension]</p>
+<div class="legend">
+Strain rate invariant for the numerical extension models after 5 cm of
+extension. The resolutions of the various models are:
+I2ELVIS: [;400 \times 75;]
+LAPEX-2D: [;301 \times 71;]
+Microfem: [;201 \times 61;]
+SloMo: [;401 \times 71;]
+Sopale: [;401 \times 71;]
+Gale: [;1024 \times 128;]
+Uper images reproduced, with permission, from Buiter et al.
+[Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox].</div>
</div>
<div class="figure">
-<img alt="images/extension_sensitivity.pdfFigure[fig:extension-convergence]Strainrateinvariantfortheextensionmodelafter5cmofextensionforfourdifferentresolutions:(a)128x16,(b)256x32,(c)512x64,and(d)1024x128." src="images/extension_sensitivity.pdfFigure[fig:extension-convergence]Strainrateinvariantfortheextensionmodelafter5cmofextensionforfourdifferentresolutions:(a)128x16,(b)256x32,(c)512x64,and(d)1024x128." />
+<img alt="images/extension_sensitivity.png" src="images/extension_sensitivity.png" />
+<p class="caption">Figure [fig:extension-convergence]</p>
+<div class="legend">
+Strain rate invariant for the extension model after 5 cm of extension
+for four different resolutions: (a) 128x16, (b) 256x32, (c) 512x64,
+and (d) 1024x128.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="shortening">
@@ -53,7 +74,7 @@
<p>This benchmark simulates a sandbox being shortened as in Figure
[fig:Shortening-model-setup]. The right side is moved to the left,
creating a velocity discontinuity at the bottom right corner. Gale's
-implementation of this benchmark is in <cite>input/benchmarks/shortening.xml</cite>.</p>
+implementation of this benchmark is in <tt class="docutils literal"><span class="pre">input/benchmarks/shortening.xml</span></tt>.</p>
<p>Like most of the codes in the benchmark, we applied diffusion (diffusion
coefficient $10^{-6}m^2s^{-1}$) to the top surface to smooth steep
slope angles. This lies within the range used in calculations used by the
@@ -61,7 +82,11 @@
Sopale: $10^{-9}m^2s^{-1}$). Again, the exact background viscosity is
not prescribed by the benchmark, so we have used $10^{12}Pa cdot s$.</p>
<div class="figure">
-<img alt="images/Shortening_setup.pngFigure[fig:Shortening-model-setup]Shorteningmodelsetup.Reproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]." src="images/Shortening_setup.pngFigure[fig:Shortening-model-setup]Shorteningmodelsetup.Reproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]." />
+<img alt="images/Shortening_setup.png" src="images/Shortening_setup.png" />
+<p class="caption">Figure [fig:Shortening-model-setup]</p>
+<div class="legend">
+Shortening model setup. Reproduced, with permission, from Buiter et al.
+[Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox].</div>
</div>
<p>A comparison against the other codes' calculations at 14 cm of cumulative
shortening is in Figure [fig:shortening-compare]. There is more variance
@@ -70,10 +95,26 @@
shows a run with a few different resolutions, and even there we see
marked differences in behavior as we increase resolution.</p>
<div class="figure">
-<img alt="images/Shortening_comparison.pngFigure[fig:shortening-compare]Strainrateinvariantforthenumericalshorteningmodelsafter14cmofshortening.Theresolutionsofthevariousmodelsare:I2ELVIS:900x75,LAPEX-2D:351x71,Microfem:201x36,Sopale:401x71,Gale:512x128.Theupperportionofthefigureisreproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]." src="images/Shortening_comparison.pngFigure[fig:shortening-compare]Strainrateinvariantforthenumericalshorteningmodelsafter14cmofshortening.Theresolutionsofthevariousmodelsare:I2ELVIS:900x75,LAPEX-2D:351x71,Microfem:201x36,Sopale:401x71,Gale:512x128.Theupperportionofthefigureisreproduced,withpermission,fromBuiteretal.[BuiteretalNumericalSandbox]." />
+<img alt="images/Shortening_comparison.png" src="images/Shortening_comparison.png" />
+<p class="caption">Figure [fig:shortening-compare]</p>
+<div class="legend">
+Strain rate invariant for the numerical shortening models after 14 cm
+of shortening. The resolutions of the various models are:
+I2ELVIS: 900 x 75,
+LAPEX-2D: 351 x 71,
+Microfem: 201 x 36,
+Sopale: 401 x 71,
+Gale: 512 x 128.
+The upper portion of the figure is reproduced, with permission, from
+Buiter et al. [Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox].</div>
</div>
<div class="figure">
-<img alt="images/shortening_sensitivity.pdfFigure[fig:shortening-convergence]Strainrateinvariantfortheshorteningmodelafter14cmofshorteningforthreedifferentresolutions:(a)128x32,(b)256x64,(c)512x128." src="images/shortening_sensitivity.pdfFigure[fig:shortening-convergence]Strainrateinvariantfortheshorteningmodelafter14cmofshorteningforthreedifferentresolutions:(a)128x32,(b)256x64,(c)512x128." />
+<img alt="images/shortening_sensitivity.png" src="images/shortening_sensitivity.png" />
+<p class="caption">Figure [fig:shortening-convergence]</p>
+<div class="legend">
+Strain rate invariant for the shortening model after 14 cm of
+shortening for three different resolutions: (a) 128 x 32,
+(b) 256 x 64, (c) 512 x 128.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.rst 2009-10-05 22:49:22 UTC (rev 15771)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/long/geomod2004.rst 2009-10-05 22:49:26 UTC (rev 15772)
@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@
calculations for other codes.
.. figure:: images/Extension_setup.png
+
Figure [fig:Extension-model-setup]
+
Extension model setup. Reproduced, with permission, from Buiter et al.
[Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox]
@@ -41,21 +43,25 @@
details, but, after a certain minimum resolution, does not change the
character of the solution.
-.. figure:: images/Extension_comparision.png (sp?)
+.. figure:: images/Extension_comparision.png
+
Figure [fig:Comparison-extension]
+
Strain rate invariant for the numerical extension models after 5 cm of
extension. The resolutions of the various models are:
- I2ELVIS: $400 \times 75$
- LAPEX-2D: $301 \times 71$
- Microfem: $201 \times 61$
- SloMo: $401 \times 71$
- Sopale: $401 \times 71$
- Gale: $1024 \times 128$
+ I2ELVIS: [;400 \\times 75;]
+ LAPEX-2D: [;301 \\times 71;]
+ Microfem: [;201 \\times 61;]
+ SloMo: [;401 \\times 71;]
+ Sopale: [;401 \\times 71;]
+ Gale: [;1024 \\times 128;]
Uper images reproduced, with permission, from Buiter et al.
[Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox].
-.. figure:: images/extension_sensitivity.pdf
+.. figure:: images/extension_sensitivity.png
+
Figure [fig:extension-convergence]
+
Strain rate invariant for the extension model after 5 cm of extension
for four different resolutions: (a) 128x16, (b) 256x32, (c) 512x64,
and (d) 1024x128.
@@ -67,7 +73,7 @@
This benchmark simulates a sandbox being shortened as in Figure
[fig:Shortening-model-setup]. The right side is moved to the left,
creating a velocity discontinuity at the bottom right corner. Gale's
-implementation of this benchmark is in `input/benchmarks/shortening.xml`.
+implementation of this benchmark is in ``input/benchmarks/shortening.xml``.
Like most of the codes in the benchmark, we applied diffusion (diffusion
coefficient $10^{-6}\ m^2\ s^{-1}$) to the top surface to smooth steep
@@ -77,7 +83,9 @@
not prescribed by the benchmark, so we have used $10^{12}\ Pa \cdot s$.
.. figure:: images/Shortening_setup.png
+
Figure [fig:Shortening-model-setup]
+
Shortening model setup. Reproduced, with permission, from Buiter et al.
[Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox].
@@ -89,7 +97,9 @@
marked differences in behavior as we increase resolution.
.. figure:: images/Shortening_comparison.png
+
Figure [fig:shortening-compare]
+
Strain rate invariant for the numerical shortening models after 14 cm
of shortening. The resolutions of the various models are:
I2ELVIS: 900 x 75,
@@ -100,8 +110,10 @@
The upper portion of the figure is reproduced, with permission, from
Buiter et al. [Buiter et al Numerical Sandbox].
-.. figure:: images/shortening_sensitivity.pdf
+.. figure:: images/shortening_sensitivity.png
+
Figure [fig:shortening-convergence]
+
Strain rate invariant for the shortening model after 14 cm of
shortening for three different resolutions: (a) 128 x 32,
(b) 256 x 64, (c) 512 x 128.
More information about the CIG-COMMITS
mailing list