[cig-commits] r15882 - in doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short: . landers rs rs-nog strikeslip
luis at geodynamics.org
luis at geodynamics.org
Mon Oct 26 16:44:23 PDT 2009
Author: luis
Date: 2009-10-26 16:44:21 -0700 (Mon, 26 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 15882
Added:
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/benchmark_geometry.png
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/images.txt
Modified:
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.header
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.rst
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.header
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.rst
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.header
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.rst
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.header
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.rst
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.header
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.rst
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.header
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.rst
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.header
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.html
doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.rst
Log:
Formatted pages in /software/benchmarks/short/
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.header
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.header 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.header 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
language:
rights:
creation_date: 2009/10/18 03:39:16.240 GMT-7
-modification_date: 2009/10/21 15:14:12.172 GMT-7
+modification_date: 2009/10/26 13:51:01.773 GMT-7
excludeFromNav: False
relatedItems:
allowDiscussion: None
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.html 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.html 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -4,61 +4,101 @@
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.5: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
-<title></title>
+<title>Benchmarks</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://geodynamics.org/cig/portal_javascripts/Plone%20Default/textheworld6.user.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../css/voidspace.css" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
-<div class="document">
+<div class="document" id="benchmarks">
+<h1 class="title">Benchmarks</h1>
-
-<p>"Overview":overview</p>
-<p>Benchmarks</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Strike-slip (no gravity)</p>
-<blockquote>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="overview">Overview</a></p>
+<div class="section" id="strike-slip-no-gravity">
+<h1>Strike-slip (no gravity)</h1>
<ul class="simple">
-<li>"Description":benchmark-strikeslip/description-ss</li>
-<li>"PyLith input":benchmark-strikeslip/pylith-0.8-input</li>
-<li>"GeoFEST input":benchmark-strikeslip/geofest-input</li>
-<li>"Submitted results":benchmark-strikeslip/result</li>
-<li>"Plots of results":benchmark-strikeslip/plots</li>
+<li><a class="reference external" href="strikeslip/description-ss">Description</a></li>
+<li><a class="reference external" href="strikeslip/pylith-0.8-input">PyLith input</a></li>
+<li><a class="reference external" href="strikeslip/geofest-input">GeoFEST input</a></li>
+<li><a class="reference external" href="strikeslip/result">Submitted results</a></li>
+<li><a class="reference external" href="strikeslip/plots">Plots of results</a></li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Reverse-slip (no gravity)</p>
-<blockquote>
-<ul class="simple">
-<li>"Description":benchmark-rs-nog/description-rs-nog</li>
-<li>"PyLith input":benchmark-rs-nog/pylith-0.8-input</li>
-<li>"GeoFEST input":benchmark-rs-nog/geofest-input</li>
-<li>"Submitted results":benchmark-rs-nog/results</li>
-<li>"Plots of results":benchmark-rs-nog/plots</li>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="reverse-slip-no-gravity">
+<h1>Reverse-slip (no gravity)</h1>
+<ul>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id1">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "description".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="rs-nog/description-rs-nog">Description</a></p>
+</li>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id2">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "pylith input".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="rs-nog/pylith-0.8-input">PyLith input</a></p>
+</li>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id3">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "geofest input".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="rs-nog/geofest-input">GeoFEST input</a></p>
+</li>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id4">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "submitted results".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="rs-nog/results">Submitted results</a></p>
+</li>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id5">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "plots of results".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="rs-nog/plots">Plots of results</a></p>
+</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Reverse-slip (with gravity)</p>
-<blockquote>
-<ul class="simple">
-<li>"Description":benchmark-rs/description-rs</li>
-<li>PyLith input (coming soon)</li>
-<li>GeoFEST input (coming soon)</li>
-<li>"Submitted results":benchmark-rs/results</li>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="reverse-slip-with-gravity">
+<h1>Reverse-slip (with gravity)</h1>
+<ul>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id6">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "description".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="rs/description-rs">Description</a></p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first">PyLith input (coming soon)</p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first">GeoFEST input (coming soon)</p>
+</li>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id7">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "submitted results".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="rs/results">Submitted results</a></p>
+</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Landers-Hector Mine</p>
-<blockquote>
-<ul class="simple">
-<li>"Description":benchmark-landers/description-landers</li>
-<li>Mesh constructed with LaGriT (coming soon)</li>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="landers-hector-mine">
+<h1>Landers-Hector Mine</h1>
+<ul>
+<li><div class="first system-message">
+<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/index.rst</tt>); <em><a href="#id8">backlink</a></em></p>
+<p>Duplicate explicit target name: "description".</p>
+</div>
+<p><a class="reference external" href="landers/description-landers">Description</a></p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first">Mesh constructed with LaGriT (coming soon)</p>
+</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Utilities</p>
-<blockquote>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="utilities">
+<h1>Utilities</h1>
<ul class="simple">
-<li>"Analytic and Semi-Analytic Codes":utilities</li>
-<li>"CUBIT examples":utilities/CUBITex</li>
+<li><a class="reference external" href="utilities">Analytic and Semi-Analytic Codes</a></li>
+<li><a class="reference external" href="utilities/CUBITex">CUBIT examples</a></li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
</div>
+</div>
</body>
</html>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.rst 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/index.rst 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -1,49 +1,46 @@
-"Overview":overview
Benchmarks
+==========
- Strike-slip (no gravity)
+`Overview <overview>`_
- * "Description":benchmark-strikeslip/description-ss
- * "PyLith input":benchmark-strikeslip/pylith-0.8-input
+Strike-slip (no gravity)
+------------------------
- * "GeoFEST input":benchmark-strikeslip/geofest-input
+* `Description <strikeslip/description-ss>`_
+* `PyLith input <strikeslip/pylith-0.8-input>`_
+* `GeoFEST input <strikeslip/geofest-input>`_
+* `Submitted results <strikeslip/result>`_
+* `Plots of results <strikeslip/plots>`_
- * "Submitted results":benchmark-strikeslip/result
- * "Plots of results":benchmark-strikeslip/plots
+Reverse-slip (no gravity)
+-------------------------
- Reverse-slip (no gravity)
+* `Description <rs-nog/description-rs-nog>`_
+* `PyLith input <rs-nog/pylith-0.8-input>`_
+* `GeoFEST input <rs-nog/geofest-input>`_
+* `Submitted results <rs-nog/results>`_
+* `Plots of results <rs-nog/plots>`_
- * "Description":benchmark-rs-nog/description-rs-nog
- * "PyLith input":benchmark-rs-nog/pylith-0.8-input
+Reverse-slip (with gravity)
+---------------------------
+* `Description <rs/description-rs>`_
+* PyLith input (coming soon)
+* GeoFEST input (coming soon)
+* `Submitted results <rs/results>`_
- * "GeoFEST input":benchmark-rs-nog/geofest-input
- * "Submitted results":benchmark-rs-nog/results
+Landers-Hector Mine
+-------------------
+* `Description <landers/description-landers>`_
+* Mesh constructed with LaGriT (coming soon)
- * "Plots of results":benchmark-rs-nog/plots
- Reverse-slip (with gravity)
-
- * "Description":benchmark-rs/description-rs
-
- * PyLith input (coming soon)
-
- * GeoFEST input (coming soon)
-
- * "Submitted results":benchmark-rs/results
-
- Landers-Hector Mine
-
- * "Description":benchmark-landers/description-landers
-
- * Mesh constructed with LaGriT (coming soon)
-
Utilities
+---------
- * "Analytic and Semi-Analytic Codes":utilities
-
- * "CUBIT examples":utilities/CUBITex
+* `Analytic and Semi-Analytic Codes <utilities>`_
+* `CUBIT examples <utilities/CUBITex>`_
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.header
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.header 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.header 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
language:
rights:
creation_date: 2009/10/18 03:57:01.646 GMT-7
-modification_date: 2009/10/19 11:06:51.313 GMT-7
+modification_date: 2009/10/26 16:40:17.180 GMT-7
excludeFromNav: False
relatedItems:
allowDiscussion: None
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.html 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.html 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -12,45 +12,62 @@
<div class="document" id="summary">
<h1 class="title">Summary</h1>
-<!-- Plone Metadata -->
<!-- description-landers -->
<!-- Benchmark Description -->
<!-- Benchmark problem description -->
+<!-- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-landers/description-landers -->
+<!-- LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm -->
+<!-- GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm -->
<p>Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from the 1992 M7.3 Landers earthquake,
focusing on the deformation in the area of the 1999 M7.1 Hector Mine earthquake.</p>
<div class="section" id="problem-specification">
<h1>Problem Specification</h1>
-<div class="section" id="model-size-need-specs-for-carl-s-mesh">
-<h2>Model size -- [NEED SPECS FOR CARL'S MESH]</h2>
+<div class="section" id="model-size">
+<h2>Model size</h2>
+<p>[NEED SPECS FOR CARL'S MESH]</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="material-properties">
<h2>Material properties</h2>
<dl class="docutils">
<dt>Elastic</dt>
-<dd><p class="first">The material properties are a simplified 1-D version of the
+<dd>The material properties are a simplified 1-D version of the
3-D SCEC Community Velocity Model. The 1-D model contains 11 layers with
uniform material properties within each layer and a minimum layer thickness
-of 2 km. The elastic properties are given in an "ASCII":materials_layers2km.txt
-file.</p>
+of 2 km. The elastic properties are given in an <a class="reference external" href="materials_layers2km.txt">ASCII</a>
+file.</dd>
+<dt>Viscoelastic</dt>
+<dd><p class="first">Maxwell linear viscoelasticity (based on values in Pollitz, EPSL, 2003)</p>
<dl class="last docutils">
-<dt>Viscoelastic -- Maxwell linear viscoelasticity (based on values in Pollitz, EPSL, 2003)</dt>
-<dd>Upper crust (-19 km ≤ z) -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
-Lower crust (-30 km ≤ z < - 19 km) -- η = 32.2e+18 Pa-s
-Mantle (z < -30 km) -- η = 4.6e+18 Pa-s</dd>
+<dt>Upper crust (-19 km ≤ z)</dt>
+<dd>η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)</dd>
+<dt>Lower crust (-30 km ≤ z < - 19 km)</dt>
+<dd>η = 32.2e+18 Pa-s</dd>
+<dt>Mantle (z < -30 km)</dt>
+<dd>η = 4.6e+18 Pa-s</dd>
</dl>
</dd>
-<dt>Fault geometry and slip distribution</dt>
-<dd>The Landers and Hector Mine fault geometries and slip distribution
-for Landers are incorporated into the LaGriT mesh.</dd>
-<dt>Boundary conditions</dt>
-<dd>Bottom and side displacements are pinned. Top of the model is a free surface.</dd>
-<dt>Discretization</dt>
-<dd>[GET SPECS FROM CARL'S MESH]</dd>
-<dt>Element types</dt>
-<dd>Linear and/or quadratic tetrahedral elements</dd>
</dl>
</div>
+<div class="section" id="fault-geometry-and-slip-distribution">
+<h2>Fault geometry and slip distribution</h2>
+<p>The Landers and Hector Mine fault geometries and slip distribution
+for Landers are incorporated into the LaGriT mesh.</p>
</div>
+<div class="section" id="boundary-conditions">
+<h2>Boundary conditions</h2>
+<p>Bottom and side displacements are pinned. Top of the model is a free surface.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="discretization">
+<h2>Discretization</h2>
+<p>[GET SPECS FROM CARL'S MESH]</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="element-types">
+<h2>Element types</h2>
+<p>Linear and/or quadratic tetrahedral elements</p>
+</div>
+</div>
<div class="section" id="requested-output">
<h1>Requested Output</h1>
<div class="section" id="solution">
@@ -60,30 +77,28 @@
coordinates of vertices) and basis functions. Also compute the traction
vector computed at the quadrature points of the faces making up the
Hector Mine faults.</p>
-<p>June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will
-switch to using HDF5 files.</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>June 30, 2006</dt>
+<dd>Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will
+switch to using HDF5 files.</dd>
+</dl>
</div>
<div class="section" id="performance">
<h2>Performance</h2>
-<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>CPU time</li>
<li>Wallclock time</li>
<li>Memory usage</li>
<li>Compiler and platform info</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="truth">
<h1>"Truth"</h1>
-<blockquote>
-You can't handle the truth</blockquote>
+<p>You can't handle the truth</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="url">
<h1>URL</h1>
-<blockquote>
-<a class="reference external" href="http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-landers/description-landers">http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-landers/description-landers</a></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.rst 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/landers/description-landers.rst 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -1,8 +1,16 @@
-.. Plone Metadata
.. description-landers
.. Benchmark Description
.. Benchmark problem description
+.. http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-landers/description-landers
+.. LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm
+.. |leq| unicode:: U+2264
+
+.. GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm
+.. |eta| unicode:: U+03B7
+
Summary
=======
@@ -12,68 +20,73 @@
Problem Specification
---------------------
-Model size -- [NEED SPECS FOR CARL'S MESH]
-``````````````````````````````````````````
+Model size
+++++++++++
+[NEED SPECS FOR CARL'S MESH]
Material properties
-```````````````````
++++++++++++++++++++
Elastic
The material properties are a simplified 1-D version of the
3-D SCEC Community Velocity Model. The 1-D model contains 11 layers with
uniform material properties within each layer and a minimum layer thickness
- of 2 km. The elastic properties are given in an "ASCII":materials_layers2km.txt
+ of 2 km. The elastic properties are given in an `ASCII <materials_layers2km.txt>`_
file.
- Viscoelastic -- Maxwell linear viscoelasticity (based on values in Pollitz, EPSL, 2003)
- Upper crust (-19 km ≤ z) -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
- Lower crust (-30 km ≤ z < - 19 km) -- η = 32.2e+18 Pa-s
- Mantle (z < -30 km) -- η = 4.6e+18 Pa-s
+Viscoelastic
+ Maxwell linear viscoelasticity (based on values in Pollitz, EPSL, 2003)
+ Upper crust (-19 km |leq| z)
+ |eta| = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
+
+ Lower crust (-30 km |leq| z < - 19 km)
+ |eta| = 32.2e+18 Pa-s
+
+ Mantle (z < -30 km)
+ |eta| = 4.6e+18 Pa-s
+
Fault geometry and slip distribution
- The Landers and Hector Mine fault geometries and slip distribution
- for Landers are incorporated into the LaGriT mesh.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+The Landers and Hector Mine fault geometries and slip distribution
+for Landers are incorporated into the LaGriT mesh.
Boundary conditions
- Bottom and side displacements are pinned. Top of the model is a free surface.
++++++++++++++++++++
+Bottom and side displacements are pinned. Top of the model is a free surface.
Discretization
- [GET SPECS FROM CARL'S MESH]
+++++++++++++++
+[GET SPECS FROM CARL'S MESH]
Element types
- Linear and/or quadratic tetrahedral elements
++++++++++++++
+Linear and/or quadratic tetrahedral elements
Requested Output
----------------
Solution
-````````
-
+++++++++
Displacements at all nodes at times of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 7 years
as well as the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and
coordinates of vertices) and basis functions. Also compute the traction
vector computed at the quadrature points of the faces making up the
Hector Mine faults.
-June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will
-switch to using HDF5 files.
+June 30, 2006
+ Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will
+ switch to using HDF5 files.
-
Performance
-```````````
++++++++++++
+* CPU time
+* Wallclock time
+* Memory usage
+* Compiler and platform info
- * CPU time
- * Wallclock time
- * Memory usage
- * Compiler and platform info
-
"Truth"
-------
+You can't handle the truth
- You can't handle the truth
-
-
-URL
----
- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-landers/description-landers
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.header
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.header 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.header 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
language:
rights:
creation_date: 2009/10/18 03:40:39.116 GMT-7
-modification_date: 2009/10/19 11:06:47.833 GMT-7
+modification_date: 2009/10/26 13:52:52.013 GMT-7
excludeFromNav: False
relatedItems:
allowDiscussion: None
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.html 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.html 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -12,58 +12,44 @@
<div class="document">
-<p>Short Name: overview
-Title: Overview
-Description: Overview of benchmark suite</p>
-<p>Overview of Goals and Objectives</p>
-<blockquote>
-In order to test the accuracy and speed of various elastic and viscoelastic</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/overview.rst</tt>, line 8)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>finite element calculations using different codes on different platforms, we
+<!-- Short Name: overview -->
+<!-- Title: Overview -->
+<!-- Description: Overview of benchmark suite -->
+<div class="section" id="overview-of-goals-and-objectives">
+<h1>Overview of Goals and Objectives</h1>
+<p>In order to test the accuracy and speed of various elastic and viscoelastic
+finite element calculations using different codes on different platforms, we
have developed the following benchmark comparisons. Information resulting from
the benchmark comparisons will be used for the following purposes.</p>
-<blockquote>
-<blockquote>
-<p>1 Confirming proper numerical implementation of the physics include
-rheological laws, fault constitutive laws, etc.</p>
-<p>1 Testing the accuracy of the numerical implementations as a function
+<ol class="arabic simple">
+<li>Confirming proper numerical implementation of the physics include
+rheological laws, fault constitutive laws, etc.</li>
+<li>Testing the accuracy of the numerical implementations as a function
of meshing scheme, number of nodes, element type, time-stepping scheme,
-code, etc.</p>
-<p>1 Testing the computational efficiency of different codes, solvers, and
+code, etc.</li>
+<li>Testing the computational efficiency of different codes, solvers, and
modeling techniques as a function of meshing scheme, number of nodes,
-element type, time-stepping scheme, code, etc.</p>
-<p>1 Comparing and evaluating available finite element codes.</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Based on the comparisons, we would like to be able to (1) identify and correct any</p>
-</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/overview.rst</tt>, line 26)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>errors in numerical implementation which currently exist in any of the considered
+element type, time-stepping scheme, code, etc.</li>
+<li>Comparing and evaluating available finite element codes.</li>
+</ol>
+<p>Based on the comparisons, we would like to be able to (1) identify and correct any
+errors in numerical implementation which currently exist in any of the considered
codes, (2) quantify differences in numerical solutions as a function of meshing
scheme, number of nodes, element type, time-stepping scheme, code, etc., and (3)
quantify and, if possible, minimize model induced uncertainties resulting from
discretization, model boundaries, unexpected transients in time-dependent materials,
etc.</p>
-<p>General Methodology</p>
-<blockquote>
-All benchmark descriptions assume a right-handed Cartesian coordinate system</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/overview.rst</tt>, line 36)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>with the x-direction running east, the y-direction running north, and the
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="general-methodology">
+<h1>General Methodology</h1>
+<p>All benchmark descriptions assume a right-handed Cartesian coordinate system
+with the x-direction running east, the y-direction running north, and the
z-direction running up. If a boundary condition is applied at a depth, d, this
will correspond to z = -d. The surface is always assumed to be at z = 0.
Use whatever coordinate system is most convienient for your program, but please
convert the results to the one defined here.</p>
-<blockquote>
-Benchmark meshes will be described at the coarsest level to be run. Because meshes</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/overview.rst</tt>, line 43)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>may be either structured or unstructured, the mesh nodal spacing described refers
+<p>Benchmark meshes will be described at the coarsest level to be run. Because meshes
+may be either structured or unstructured, the mesh nodal spacing described refers
to the average. If memory, time, and patience allow, also run models at 1/2, 1/4,
1/8, etc. the original coarse node spacing. This will make it possible to see how
accuracy and speed scale with mesh spacing. If your code permits a variety of
@@ -74,12 +60,8 @@
to employ a variable mesh (e.g., to resolve stress variations at the fault tips,
etc.) If time permits, investigate the trade-offs involved in using variable
resolution meshes.</p>
-<blockquote>
-With regard to output, there are a number of parameters which should be noted</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/overview.rst</tt>, line 56)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>for each model. For the purposes of determining accuracy, please record displacements
+<p>With regard to output, there are a number of parameters which should be noted
+for each model. For the purposes of determining accuracy, please record displacements
at all nodes and stresses (all 6 independent components) at all Gauss points
at each specified time. For the purposes of evaluating performance, please try
to keep track of memory usage (including the size of stiffness matrix and mean
@@ -87,14 +69,11 @@
inclusion in the summary analysis can be found at this document. To ease the
burden on those who are compiling the data, your results will not be accepted
unless they are in the specified format.</p>
-<blockquote>
-When available, analytical solutions for the various benchmarks will be given</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/overview.rst</tt>, line 66)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>on the CIG website at <a class="reference external" href="http://XXXXXXXX">http://XXXXXXXX</a>. Whenever possible, please check to make
+<p>When available, analytical solutions for the various benchmarks will be given
+on the CIG website at <a class="reference external" href="http://XXXXXXXX">http://XXXXXXXX</a>. Whenever possible, please check to make
sure your results are essentially correct before submitting them for the summary
analysis.</p>
</div>
+</div>
</body>
</html>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.rst 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/overview.rst 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -1,28 +1,29 @@
-Short Name: overview
-Title: Overview
-Description: Overview of benchmark suite
+.. Short Name: overview
+.. Title: Overview
+.. Description: Overview of benchmark suite
Overview of Goals and Objectives
+--------------------------------
- In order to test the accuracy and speed of various elastic and viscoelastic
+In order to test the accuracy and speed of various elastic and viscoelastic
finite element calculations using different codes on different platforms, we
have developed the following benchmark comparisons. Information resulting from
the benchmark comparisons will be used for the following purposes.
- 1 Confirming proper numerical implementation of the physics include
- rheological laws, fault constitutive laws, etc.
+#. Confirming proper numerical implementation of the physics include
+ rheological laws, fault constitutive laws, etc.
- 1 Testing the accuracy of the numerical implementations as a function
- of meshing scheme, number of nodes, element type, time-stepping scheme,
- code, etc.
+#. Testing the accuracy of the numerical implementations as a function
+ of meshing scheme, number of nodes, element type, time-stepping scheme,
+ code, etc.
- 1 Testing the computational efficiency of different codes, solvers, and
- modeling techniques as a function of meshing scheme, number of nodes,
- element type, time-stepping scheme, code, etc.
+#. Testing the computational efficiency of different codes, solvers, and
+ modeling techniques as a function of meshing scheme, number of nodes,
+ element type, time-stepping scheme, code, etc.
- 1 Comparing and evaluating available finite element codes.
+#. Comparing and evaluating available finite element codes.
- Based on the comparisons, we would like to be able to (1) identify and correct any
+Based on the comparisons, we would like to be able to (1) identify and correct any
errors in numerical implementation which currently exist in any of the considered
codes, (2) quantify differences in numerical solutions as a function of meshing
scheme, number of nodes, element type, time-stepping scheme, code, etc., and (3)
@@ -31,15 +32,16 @@
etc.
General Methodology
+-------------------
- All benchmark descriptions assume a right-handed Cartesian coordinate system
+All benchmark descriptions assume a right-handed Cartesian coordinate system
with the x-direction running east, the y-direction running north, and the
z-direction running up. If a boundary condition is applied at a depth, d, this
will correspond to z = -d. The surface is always assumed to be at z = 0.
Use whatever coordinate system is most convienient for your program, but please
convert the results to the one defined here.
- Benchmark meshes will be described at the coarsest level to be run. Because meshes
+Benchmark meshes will be described at the coarsest level to be run. Because meshes
may be either structured or unstructured, the mesh nodal spacing described refers
to the average. If memory, time, and patience allow, also run models at 1/2, 1/4,
1/8, etc. the original coarse node spacing. This will make it possible to see how
@@ -52,7 +54,7 @@
etc.) If time permits, investigate the trade-offs involved in using variable
resolution meshes.
- With regard to output, there are a number of parameters which should be noted
+With regard to output, there are a number of parameters which should be noted
for each model. For the purposes of determining accuracy, please record displacements
at all nodes and stresses (all 6 independent components) at all Gauss points
at each specified time. For the purposes of evaluating performance, please try
@@ -62,8 +64,7 @@
burden on those who are compiling the data, your results will not be accepted
unless they are in the specified format.
- When available, analytical solutions for the various benchmarks will be given
+When available, analytical solutions for the various benchmarks will be given
on the CIG website at http://XXXXXXXX. Whenever possible, please check to make
sure your results are essentially correct before submitting them for the summary
analysis.
-
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.header
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.header 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.header 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
language:
rights:
creation_date: 2009/10/18 03:55:00.104 GMT-7
-modification_date: 2009/10/19 11:06:50.893 GMT-7
+modification_date: 2009/10/26 16:40:16.764 GMT-7
excludeFromNav: False
relatedItems:
allowDiscussion: None
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.html 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.html 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -4,22 +4,26 @@
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.5: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
-<title></title>
+<title>Benchmark Description</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://geodynamics.org/cig/portal_javascripts/Plone%20Default/textheworld6.user.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../css/voidspace.css" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
-<div class="document">
+<div class="document" id="benchmark-description">
+<h1 class="title">Benchmark Description</h1>
-
-<dl class="docutils">
-<dt>Plone Metadata</dt>
-<dd>description-rs
-Benchmark Description
-Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 6b.</dd>
-</dl>
-<p>Summary</p>
-<blockquote>
+<!-- description-rs -->
+<!-- Benchmark Description -->
+<!-- Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 6b. -->
+<!-- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs/description-rs -->
+<!-- LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm -->
+<!-- GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm -->
+<!-- DEGREE SIGN -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/00b0/index.htm -->
+<div class="section" id="summary">
+<h1>Summary</h1>
<p>Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single, finite, reverse-slip
earthquake in 3D with gravity. Evaluate results with imposed displacement boundary
conditions on a cube with sides of length 24 km. The displacements imposed are
@@ -29,85 +33,106 @@
<p>The effects of gravitational loading should be relaxed before the fault slip is
imposed. Alternatively, Winkler nodes could be used to calculate the gravitational
restoring forces resulting from the deformed upper surface.</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Problem Specificaqtion</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Model size -- 0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Top layer -- -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<p>Bottom layer -- -24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Material properties -- The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer
-is viscoelastic.</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Elastic -- Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa, ρ = 3000 kg/m^3; g = 9.80665 m/s^2</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="problem-specification">
+<h1>Problem Specification</h1>
+<div class="section" id="model-size">
+<h2>Model size</h2>
+<p>0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Top layer</dt>
+<dd>-12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</dd>
+<dt>Bottom layer</dt>
+<dd>-24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="material-properties">
+<h2>Material properties</h2>
+<p>The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer is viscoelastic.</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Elastic</dt>
+<dd>Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa, ρ = 3000 kg/m^3; g = 9.80665 m/s^2</dd>
+</dl>
<p>Maxwell viscoelastic material properties</p>
<blockquote>
-<p>Top layer -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)</p>
-<p>Bottom layer -- η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Top layer</dt>
+<dd>η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)</dd>
+<dt>Bottom layer</dt>
+<dd>η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s</dd>
+</dl>
</blockquote>
-<p>Boundary conditions</p>
-<blockquote>
-Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="boundary-conditions">
+<h2>Boundary conditions</h2>
+<p>Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of the symmetry.) Top of the
-model is a free surface.</blockquote>
-<p>Discretization</p>
-<blockquote>
-The model should be discretized with a nominal spatial resolution of 1000m,
+model is a free surface.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="discretization">
+<h2>Discretization</h2>
+<p>The model should be discretized with a nominal spatial resolution of 1000m,
500m, and 250m. If possible, also run the models with a nominal spatial
resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable (optimal)
spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the uniform resolution
-meshes.</blockquote>
-<p>Element types</p>
-<blockquote>
-Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral</blockquote>
-<p>Fault specifications</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Type -- 45 degree dipping reverse fault.</p>
-<p>Location -- Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km
-and bottom edge at x = -12 km. 0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<p>Slip distribution -- 1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
+meshes.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="element-types">
+<h2>Element types</h2>
+<p>Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="fault-specifications">
+<h2>Fault specifications</h2>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Type</dt>
+<dd>45° dipping reverse fault.</dd>
+<dt>Location</dt>
+<dd>Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km
+and bottom edge at x = -12 km. 0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</dd>
+<dt>Slip distribution</dt>
+<dd>1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
and -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip at y = 16 km and z = -16 km.
In the region where the two tapers overlap, each slip value is the minimum
-of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Boundary conditions</p>
-<blockquote>
-Lateral and bottom displacements are set to analytic elastic solution.
+of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="id1">
+<h2>Boundary conditions</h2>
+<p>Lateral and bottom displacements are set to analytic elastic solution.
Note that the side at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of the
-imposed symmetry at y = 0 km.</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Requested Output</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Solution</p>
-<blockquote>
+imposed symmetry at y = 0 km.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="requested-output">
+<h1>Requested Output</h1>
+<div class="section" id="solution">
+<h2>Solution</h2>
<p>Displacements at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years
as well as the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and
coordinates of vertices) and basis functions.</p>
-<p>June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
-to using HDF5 files.</p>
-<p>Performance</p>
-<blockquote>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>June 30, 2006</dt>
+<dd>Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
+to using HDF5 files.</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="performance">
+<h2>Performance</h2>
<ul class="simple">
<li>CPU time</li>
<li>Wallclock time</li>
<li>Memory usage</li>
<li>Compiler and platform info</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>"Truth"</p>
-<blockquote>
-Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
+</div>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="truth">
+<h1>"Truth"</h1>
+<p>Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical
solutions to the viscoelastic problem are being sought if anyone has
-any information.</blockquote>
-<dl class="docutils">
-<dt>URL</dt>
-<dd><a class="reference external" href="http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs/description-rs">http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs/description-rs</a></dd>
-</dl>
+any information.</p>
</div>
+</div>
</body>
</html>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.rst 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs/description-rs.rst 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -1,104 +1,134 @@
-Plone Metadata
- description-rs
- Benchmark Description
- Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 6b.
+.. description-rs
+.. Benchmark Description
+.. Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 6b.
+.. http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs/description-rs
-Summary
+.. LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm
+.. |leq| unicode:: U+2264
- Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single, finite, reverse-slip
- earthquake in 3D with gravity. Evaluate results with imposed displacement boundary
- conditions on a cube with sides of length 24 km. The displacements imposed are
- the analytic elastic solutions. Symmetry boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0,
- so the solution is equivalent to that for a domain with a 48 km length in the
- y direction.
+.. GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm
+.. |eta| unicode:: U+03B7
- The effects of gravitational loading should be relaxed before the fault slip is
- imposed. Alternatively, Winkler nodes could be used to calculate the gravitational
- restoring forces resulting from the deformed upper surface.
+.. DEGREE SIGN
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/00b0/index.htm
+.. |deg| unicode:: U+00B0
-Problem Specificaqtion
+Benchmark Description
+=====================
- Model size -- 0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km
+Summary
+-------
- Top layer -- -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km
+Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single, finite, reverse-slip
+earthquake in 3D with gravity. Evaluate results with imposed displacement boundary
+conditions on a cube with sides of length 24 km. The displacements imposed are
+the analytic elastic solutions. Symmetry boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0,
+so the solution is equivalent to that for a domain with a 48 km length in the
+y direction.
- Bottom layer -- -24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km
+The effects of gravitational loading should be relaxed before the fault slip is
+imposed. Alternatively, Winkler nodes could be used to calculate the gravitational
+restoring forces resulting from the deformed upper surface.
- Material properties -- The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer
- is viscoelastic.
- Elastic -- Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa, ρ = 3000 kg/m^3; g = 9.80665 m/s^2
+Problem Specification
+---------------------
- Maxwell viscoelastic material properties
+Model size
+++++++++++
+0 km |leq| x |leq| 24 km; 0 km |leq| y |leq| 24 km; -24 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km
- Top layer -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
+Top layer
+ -12 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km
- Bottom layer -- η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s
+Bottom layer
+ -24 km |leq| z |leq| -12 km
- Boundary conditions
+Material properties
++++++++++++++++++++
+The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer is viscoelastic.
- Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
- at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of the symmetry.) Top of the
- model is a free surface.
+Elastic
+ Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa, ρ = 3000 kg/m^3; g = 9.80665 m/s^2
- Discretization
+Maxwell viscoelastic material properties
- The model should be discretized with a nominal spatial resolution of 1000m,
- 500m, and 250m. If possible, also run the models with a nominal spatial
- resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable (optimal)
- spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the uniform resolution
- meshes.
+ Top layer
+ |eta| = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
- Element types
+ Bottom layer
+ |eta| = 1.0e+18 Pa-s
- Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral
+Boundary conditions
++++++++++++++++++++
+Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
+at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of the symmetry.) Top of the
+model is a free surface.
- Fault specifications
+Discretization
+++++++++++++++
+The model should be discretized with a nominal spatial resolution of 1000m,
+500m, and 250m. If possible, also run the models with a nominal spatial
+resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable (optimal)
+spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the uniform resolution
+meshes.
- Type -- 45 degree dipping reverse fault.
+Element types
++++++++++++++
+Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral
- Location -- Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km
- and bottom edge at x = -12 km. 0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km
- Slip distribution -- 1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
- and -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip at y = 16 km and z = -16 km.
- In the region where the two tapers overlap, each slip value is the minimum
- of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).
+Fault specifications
+++++++++++++++++++++
- Boundary conditions
+Type
+ 45\ |deg| dipping reverse fault.
- Lateral and bottom displacements are set to analytic elastic solution.
- Note that the side at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of the
- imposed symmetry at y = 0 km.
+Location
+ Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km
+ and bottom edge at x = -12 km. 0 km |leq| y |leq| 16 km; -16 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km
-Requested Output
+Slip distribution
+ 1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km |leq| y |leq| 12 km
+ and -12 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip at y = 16 km and z = -16 km.
+ In the region where the two tapers overlap, each slip value is the minimum
+ of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).
- Solution
+Boundary conditions
++++++++++++++++++++
+Lateral and bottom displacements are set to analytic elastic solution.
+Note that the side at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of the
+imposed symmetry at y = 0 km.
- Displacements at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years
- as well as the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and
- coordinates of vertices) and basis functions.
- June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
- to using HDF5 files.
+Requested Output
+----------------
- Performance
+Solution
+++++++++
- * CPU time
+Displacements at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years
+as well as the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and
+coordinates of vertices) and basis functions.
- * Wallclock time
+June 30, 2006
+ Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
+ to using HDF5 files.
- * Memory usage
+Performance
++++++++++++
+* CPU time
+* Wallclock time
+* Memory usage
+* Compiler and platform info
- * Compiler and platform info
"Truth"
+-------
+Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
+viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical
+solutions to the viscoelastic problem are being sought if anyone has
+any information.
- Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
- viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical
- solutions to the viscoelastic problem are being sought if anyone has
- any information.
-
-
-URL
- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs/description-rs
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.header
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.header 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.header 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
language:
rights:
creation_date: 2009/10/18 03:51:38.476 GMT-7
-modification_date: 2009/10/19 11:06:49.926 GMT-7
+modification_date: 2009/10/26 16:40:16.245 GMT-7
excludeFromNav: False
relatedItems:
allowDiscussion: None
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.html 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.html 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -4,102 +4,125 @@
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.5: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
-<title></title>
+<title>Benchmark Description</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://geodynamics.org/cig/portal_javascripts/Plone%20Default/textheworld6.user.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../css/voidspace.css" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
-<div class="document">
+<div class="document" id="benchmark-description">
+<h1 class="title">Benchmark Description</h1>
-
-<dl class="docutils">
-<dt>Plone Metadata</dt>
-<dd>description-rs-nog
-Benchmark Description
-Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 5b.</dd>
-</dl>
-<p>Summary</p>
-<blockquote>
-Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single finite, reverse-slip</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.rst</tt>, line 9)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>earthquake in 3-D without gravity. Evaluate results with imposed displacement boundary
+<!-- description-rs-nog -->
+<!-- Benchmark Description -->
+<!-- Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 5b. -->
+<!-- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs-nog/description-rs-nog -->
+<!-- LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm -->
+<!-- GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm -->
+<!-- DEGREE SIGN -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/00b0/index.htm -->
+<div class="section" id="summary">
+<h1>Summary</h1>
+<p>Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single finite, reverse-slip
+earthquake in 3-D without gravity. Evaluate results with imposed displacement boundary
conditions on a cube with sides of length 24 km. The displacements imposed are the
analytic elastic solutions. Symmetry boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0,
so the solution is equivalent to that for a domain with a 48 km length in the
y direction.</p>
-<p>Problem Specification</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Model size -- 0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Top layer -- -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<p>Bottom layer -- -24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Material properties -- The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer is viscoelastic.</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Elastic -- Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa</p>
-<p>Viscoelasticity -- Maxwell linear viscoelasticity</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Top layer -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)</p>
-<p>Bottom layer -- η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Fault specifications</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Type -- 45 degree dipping reverse fault.</p>
-<p>Location -- Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km,
-and bottom edge at x = 20 km. 0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<p>Slip distribution -- 1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="problem-specification">
+<h1>Problem Specification</h1>
+<div class="section" id="model-size">
+<h2>Model size</h2>
+<p>0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Top layer</dt>
+<dd>-12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</dd>
+<dt>Bottom layer</dt>
+<dd>-24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="material-properties">
+<h2>Material properties</h2>
+<p>The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer is viscoelastic.</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Elastic</dt>
+<dd>Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa</dd>
+<dt>Viscoelasticity</dt>
+<dd><p class="first">Maxwell linear viscoelasticity</p>
+<dl class="last docutils">
+<dt>Top layer</dt>
+<dd>η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)</dd>
+<dt>Bottom layer</dt>
+<dd>η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s</dd>
+</dl>
+</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="fault-specifications">
+<h2>Fault specifications</h2>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Type</dt>
+<dd>45° dipping reverse fault.</dd>
+<dt>Location</dt>
+<dd>Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km,
+and bottom edge at x = 20 km. 0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</dd>
+<dt>Slip distribution</dt>
+<dd>1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
and -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip at y = 16 km and
z = -16 km. In the region where the two tapers overlap, each slip value
-is the minimum of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Boundary conditions</p>
-<blockquote>
-Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
+is the minimum of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="boundary-conditions">
+<h2>Boundary conditions</h2>
+<p>Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of symmetry). Top of the
-model is a free surface.</blockquote>
-<p>Discretization</p>
-<blockquote>
-The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
+model is a free surface.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="discretization">
+<h2>Discretization</h2>
+<p>The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
1000 m, 500 m, 250 m. If possible, also run the models with a nominal
spatial resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable (optimal)
spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the uniform resolution
-meshes.</blockquote>
-<p>Element types</p>
-<blockquote>
-Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Requested Output</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Solution</p>
-<blockquote>
+meshes.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="element-types">
+<h2>Element types</h2>
+<p>Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="requested-output">
+<h1>Requested Output</h1>
+<div class="section" id="solution">
+<h2>Solution</h2>
<p>Displacements at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years as well as
the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and coordinates of
vertices) and basis functions.</p>
-<p>June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
-to using HDF5 files.</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Performance</p>
-<blockquote>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>June 30, 2006</dt>
+<dd>Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
+to using HDF5 files.</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="performance">
+<h2>Performance</h2>
<ul class="simple">
<li>CPU time</li>
<li>Wallclock time</li>
<li>Memory usage</li>
<li>Compiler and platform info</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>"Truth"</p>
-<blockquote>
-Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
+</div>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="truth">
+<h1>"Truth"</h1>
+<p>Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical solutions
-to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.</blockquote>
-<dl class="docutils">
-<dt>URL</dt>
-<dd><a class="reference external" href="http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs-nog/description-rs-nog">http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs-nog/description-rs-nog</a></dd>
-</dl>
+to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.</p>
</div>
+</div>
</body>
</html>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.rst 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/rs-nog/description-rs-nog.rst 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -1,93 +1,128 @@
-Plone Metadata
- description-rs-nog
- Benchmark Description
- Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 5b.
+.. description-rs-nog
+.. Benchmark Description
+.. Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 5b.
+.. http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs-nog/description-rs-nog
+.. LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm
+.. |leq| unicode:: U+2264
+
+.. GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm
+.. |eta| unicode:: U+03B7
+
+.. DEGREE SIGN
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/00b0/index.htm
+.. |deg| unicode:: U+00B0
+
+
+Benchmark Description
+=====================
+
+
Summary
+-------
- Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single finite, reverse-slip
+Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single finite, reverse-slip
earthquake in 3-D without gravity. Evaluate results with imposed displacement boundary
conditions on a cube with sides of length 24 km. The displacements imposed are the
analytic elastic solutions. Symmetry boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0,
so the solution is equivalent to that for a domain with a 48 km length in the
y direction.
+
Problem Specification
+---------------------
- Model size -- 0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km
+Model size
+++++++++++
+0 km |leq| x |leq| 24 km; 0 km |leq| y |leq| 24 km; -24 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km
- Top layer -- -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km
+Top layer
+ -12 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km
- Bottom layer -- -24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km
+Bottom layer
+ -24 km |leq| z |leq| -12 km
- Material properties -- The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer is viscoelastic.
+Material properties
++++++++++++++++++++
+The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer is viscoelastic.
- Elastic -- Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa
+Elastic
+ Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa
- Viscoelasticity -- Maxwell linear viscoelasticity
+Viscoelasticity
+ Maxwell linear viscoelasticity
- Top layer -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
+ Top layer
+ |eta| = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
- Bottom layer -- η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s
+ Bottom layer
+ |eta| = 1.0e+18 Pa-s
- Fault specifications
+Fault specifications
+++++++++++++++++++++
- Type -- 45 degree dipping reverse fault.
+Type
+ 45\ |deg| dipping reverse fault.
- Location -- Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km,
- and bottom edge at x = 20 km. 0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km
+Location
+ Strike parallel to y-direction with top edge at x = 4 km,
+ and bottom edge at x = 20 km. 0 km |leq| y |leq| 16 km; -16 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km
- Slip distribution -- 1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
- and -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip at y = 16 km and
- z = -16 km. In the region where the two tapers overlap, each slip value
- is the minimum of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).
+Slip distribution
+ 1 m of uniform thrust slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
+ and -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip at y = 16 km and
+ z = -16 km. In the region where the two tapers overlap, each slip value
+ is the minimum of the two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).
- Boundary conditions
+Boundary conditions
++++++++++++++++++++
- Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
- at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of symmetry). Top of the
- model is a free surface.
+Bottom and side displacements set to analytic solution. (Note: the side
+at y = 0 km has zero y-displacements because of symmetry). Top of the
+model is a free surface.
- Discretization
+Discretization
+++++++++++++++
- The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
- 1000 m, 500 m, 250 m. If possible, also run the models with a nominal
- spatial resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable (optimal)
- spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the uniform resolution
- meshes.
+The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
+1000 m, 500 m, 250 m. If possible, also run the models with a nominal
+spatial resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable (optimal)
+spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the uniform resolution
+meshes.
- Element types
+Element types
++++++++++++++
- Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.
+Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.
Requested Output
+----------------
- Solution
+Solution
+++++++++
- Displacements at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years as well as
- the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and coordinates of
- vertices) and basis functions.
+Displacements at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years as well as
+the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and coordinates of
+vertices) and basis functions.
- June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
+June 30, 2006
+ Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
to using HDF5 files.
- Performance
+Performance
++++++++++++
+* CPU time
+* Wallclock time
+* Memory usage
+* Compiler and platform info
- * CPU time
- * Wallclock time
-
- * Memory usage
-
- * Compiler and platform info
-
"Truth"
+-------
+Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
+viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical solutions
+to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.
- Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
- viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical solutions
- to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.
-
-
-URL
- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-rs-nog/description-rs-nog
Added: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/benchmark_geometry.png
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)
Property changes on: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/benchmark_geometry.png
___________________________________________________________________
Name: svn:mime-type
+ image/png
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.header
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.header 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.header 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
language:
rights:
creation_date: 2009/10/18 03:46:00.172 GMT-7
-modification_date: 2009/10/19 11:06:48.728 GMT-7
+modification_date: 2009/10/26 16:40:15.287 GMT-7
excludeFromNav: False
relatedItems:
allowDiscussion: None
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.html 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.html 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -4,109 +4,137 @@
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.5: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
-<title></title>
+<title>Benchmark Description</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://geodynamics.org/cig/portal_javascripts/Plone%20Default/textheworld6.user.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../css/voidspace.css" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
-<div class="document">
+<div class="document" id="benchmark-description">
+<h1 class="title">Benchmark Description</h1>
-
-<p>Plone Metadata</p>
-<blockquote>
-description-ss
-Benchmark Description
-Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b.</blockquote>
-<p>Summary</p>
-<blockquote>
-Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single, finite,</blockquote>
-<div class="system-message">
-<p class="system-message-title">System Message: WARNING/2 (<tt class="docutils">./short/strikeslip/description-ss.rst</tt>, line 10)</p>
-Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.</div>
-<p>strike-slip earthquake in 3-D without gravity. Evaluate results with imposed
-displacement boundary conditions on a cube with sides of length 24 km. The
-displacements imposed are the analytic elastic solutions. Anti-plane strain
-boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0, so the solution is equivalent
-to that for a domain with a 48 km length in the y direction.</p>
-<p>Problem Specification</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>"Problem geometry":img:benchmark_geometry.png</p>
-<p>Model size -- 0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Top layer -- -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
-<p>Bottom layer -- -24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Material properties -- The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer
-is viscoelastic.</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Elastic -- Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa</p>
-<p>Viscoelasticity -- Maxwell linear viscoelasticity</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Top layer -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)</p>
-<p>Bottom layer -- η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s</p>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Fault specifications</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Type -- Vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault.</p>
+<!-- description-ss -->
+<!-- Benchmark Description -->
+<!-- Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b. -->
+<!-- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-strikeslip/description-ss -->
+<!-- LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm -->
+<!-- GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA -->
+<!-- http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm -->
+<div class="section" id="summary">
+<h1>Summary</h1>
+<p>Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single, finite,
+strike-slip earthquake in 3-D without gravity. Evaluate results with
+imposed displacement boundary conditions on a cube with sides of
+length 24 km. The displacements imposed are the analytic elastic
+solutions. Anti-plane strain boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0,
+so the solution is equivalent to that for a domain with a 48 km length
+in the y direction.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="problem-specification">
+<h1>Problem Specification</h1>
+<!-- fig:benchmark_geometry -->
+<!-- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-strikeslip/benchmark_geometry.png/view -->
+<div class="figure">
+<img alt="benchmark_geometry.png" src="benchmark_geometry.png" />
+<p class="caption">Problem geometry</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="model-size">
+<h2>Model size</h2>
+<p>0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 ≤ z ≤ 0 km</p>
<dl class="docutils">
-<dt>Location --</dt>
+<dt>Top layer</dt>
+<dd>-12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km</dd>
+<dt>Bottom layer</dt>
+<dd>-24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="material-properties">
+<h2>Material properties</h2>
+<p>The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the
+bottom layer is viscoelastic.</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Elastic</dt>
+<dd>Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa</dd>
+<dt>Viscoelasticity</dt>
+<dd><p class="first">Maxwell linear viscoelasticity</p>
+<dl class="last docutils">
+<dt>Top layer</dt>
+<dd>η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)</dd>
+<dt>Bottom layer</dt>
+<dd>η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s</dd>
+</dl>
+</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="fault-specifications">
+<h2>Fault specifications</h2>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>Type</dt>
+<dd>Vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault.</dd>
+<dt>Location</dt>
<dd>Strike parallel to y-direction at center of model (x = 12 km)
0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km.</dd>
-<dt>Slip distribution --</dt>
+<dt>Slip distribution</dt>
<dd>1 m of uniform strike slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
and -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip
at y = 16 km and z = -16 km. In the region where the two
tapers overlap, each slip value is the minimum of the
two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).</dd>
</dl>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Boundary conditions</p>
-<blockquote>
-Bottom and side displacements are set to the elastic analytical solution,
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="boundary-conditions">
+<h2>Boundary conditions</h2>
+<p>Bottom and side displacements are set to the elastic analytical solution,
and the top of the model is a free surface. There are two exceptions to
these applied boundary conditions. The first is on the y = 0 plane, where
y-displacements are left free to preserve symmetry, and the x- and
z-displacements are set to zero. The second is along the line segment
between (12, 0, -24) and (12, 24, -24), where the analytical solution
blows up in some cases. Along this line segment, all 3 displacement
-components are left free.</blockquote>
-<p>Discretization</p>
-<blockquote>
-The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
+components are left free.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="discretization">
+<h2>Discretization</h2>
+<p>The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
1000 m, 500 m, and 250 m. If possible, also run the models with a nomial
spatial resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable
(optimal) spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the
-uniform resolution meshes.</blockquote>
-<p>Element types</p>
-<blockquote>
-Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Requested Output</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Solution</p>
-<blockquote>
-<p>Displacement at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years as well
-as the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and coordinates
-of vertices) and basis functions.</p>
-<p>June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
-to using HDF5 files.</p>
-</blockquote>
-<p>Performance</p>
-<blockquote>
+uniform resolution meshes.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="element-types">
+<h2>Element types</h2>
+<p>Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="requested-output">
+<h1>Requested Output</h1>
+<div class="section" id="solution">
+<h2>Solution</h2>
+<p>Displacement at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years as well as
+the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and coordinates of
+vertices) and basis functions.</p>
+<dl class="docutils">
+<dt>June 30, 2006</dt>
+<dd>Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
+to using HDF5 files.</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="performance">
+<h2>Performance</h2>
<ul class="simple">
<li>CPU time</li>
<li>Wallclock time</li>
<li>Memory usage</li>
<li>Compiler and platform info</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<p>"Truth"</p>
-<blockquote>
-Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
+</div>
+</div>
+<div class="section" id="truth">
+<h1>"Truth"</h1>
+<p>Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical solutions
-to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.</blockquote>
+to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.</p>
</div>
+</div>
</body>
</html>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.rst 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/description-ss.rst 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -1,103 +1,138 @@
-Plone Metadata
+.. description-ss
+.. Benchmark Description
+.. Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b.
+.. http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-strikeslip/description-ss
- description-ss
- Benchmark Description
- Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b.
+.. LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2264/index.htm
+.. |leq| unicode:: U+2264
+.. GREEK SMALL LETTER ETA
+.. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/03b7/index.htm
+.. |eta| unicode:: U+03B7
+
+Benchmark Description
+=====================
+
+
Summary
+-------
- Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single, finite,
-strike-slip earthquake in 3-D without gravity. Evaluate results with imposed
-displacement boundary conditions on a cube with sides of length 24 km. The
-displacements imposed are the analytic elastic solutions. Anti-plane strain
-boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0, so the solution is equivalent
-to that for a domain with a 48 km length in the y direction.
+Viscoelastic (Maxwell) relaxation of stresses from a single, finite,
+strike-slip earthquake in 3-D without gravity. Evaluate results with
+imposed displacement boundary conditions on a cube with sides of
+length 24 km. The displacements imposed are the analytic elastic
+solutions. Anti-plane strain boundary conditions are imposed at y = 0,
+so the solution is equivalent to that for a domain with a 48 km length
+in the y direction.
+
Problem Specification
+---------------------
- "Problem geometry":img:benchmark_geometry.png
+.. fig:benchmark_geometry
+.. http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-strikeslip/benchmark_geometry.png/view
+.. figure:: benchmark_geometry.png
- Model size -- 0 km ≤ x ≤ 24 km; 0 km ≤ y ≤ 24 km; -24 ≤ z ≤ 0 km
+ Problem geometry
- Top layer -- -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km
+Model size
+++++++++++
+0 km |leq| x |leq| 24 km; 0 km |leq| y |leq| 24 km; -24 |leq| z |leq| 0 km
- Bottom layer -- -24 km ≤ z ≤ -12 km
+Top layer
+ -12 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km
- Material properties -- The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the bottom layer
- is viscoelastic.
+Bottom layer
+ -24 km |leq| z |leq| -12 km
- Elastic -- Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa
+Material properties
++++++++++++++++++++
+The top layer is nearly elastic whereas the
+bottom layer is viscoelastic.
- Viscoelasticity -- Maxwell linear viscoelasticity
+Elastic
+ Poisson solid, G = 30 GPa
- Top layer -- η = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
+Viscoelasticity
+ Maxwell linear viscoelasticity
- Bottom layer -- η = 1.0e+18 Pa-s
+ Top layer
+ |eta| = 1.0e+25 Pa-s (essentially elastic)
- Fault specifications
+ Bottom layer
+ |eta| = 1.0e+18 Pa-s
- Type -- Vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault.
- Location --
- Strike parallel to y-direction at center of model (x = 12 km)
- 0 km ≤ y ≤ 16 km; -16 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km.
-
- Slip distribution --
- 1 m of uniform strike slip motion for 0 km ≤ y ≤ 12 km
- and -12 km ≤ z ≤ 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip
- at y = 16 km and z = -16 km. In the region where the two
- tapers overlap, each slip value is the minimum of the
- two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).
+Fault specifications
+++++++++++++++++++++
- Boundary conditions
+Type
+ Vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault.
- Bottom and side displacements are set to the elastic analytical solution,
- and the top of the model is a free surface. There are two exceptions to
- these applied boundary conditions. The first is on the y = 0 plane, where
- y-displacements are left free to preserve symmetry, and the x- and
- z-displacements are set to zero. The second is along the line segment
- between (12, 0, -24) and (12, 24, -24), where the analytical solution
- blows up in some cases. Along this line segment, all 3 displacement
- components are left free.
+Location
+ Strike parallel to y-direction at center of model (x = 12 km)
+ 0 km |leq| y |leq| 16 km; -16 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km.
- Discretization
+Slip distribution
+ 1 m of uniform strike slip motion for 0 km |leq| y |leq| 12 km
+ and -12 km |leq| z |leq| 0 km with a linear taper to 0 slip
+ at y = 16 km and z = -16 km. In the region where the two
+ tapers overlap, each slip value is the minimum of the
+ two tapers (so that the taper remains linear).
- The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
- 1000 m, 500 m, and 250 m. If possible, also run the models with a nomial
- spatial resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable
- (optimal) spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the
- uniform resolution meshes.
+Boundary conditions
++++++++++++++++++++
- Element types
+Bottom and side displacements are set to the elastic analytical solution,
+and the top of the model is a free surface. There are two exceptions to
+these applied boundary conditions. The first is on the y = 0 plane, where
+y-displacements are left free to preserve symmetry, and the x- and
+z-displacements are set to zero. The second is along the line segment
+between (12, 0, -24) and (12, 24, -24), where the analytical solution
+blows up in some cases. Along this line segment, all 3 displacement
+components are left free.
- Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.
+Discretization
+++++++++++++++
+The model should be discretized with nominal spatial resolutions of
+1000 m, 500 m, and 250 m. If possible, also run the models with a nomial
+spatial resolution of 125 m. Optionally, use meshes with variable
+(optimal) spatial resolution with the same number of nodes as the
+uniform resolution meshes.
-Requested Output
+Element types
++++++++++++++
- Solution
+Linear and/or quadratic and tetrahedral and/or hexahedral.
- Displacement at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years as well
- as the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and coordinates
- of vertices) and basis functions.
- June 30, 2006 -- Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
- to using HDF5 files.
+Requested Output
+----------------
- Performance
+Solution
+++++++++
- * CPU time
+Displacement at all nodes at times of 0, 1, 5, and 10 years as well as
+the mesh topology (i.e., element connectivity arrays and coordinates of
+vertices) and basis functions.
- * Wallclock time
+June 30, 2006
+ Use ASCII output for now. In the future we will switch
+ to using HDF5 files.
- * Memory usage
+Performance
++++++++++++
+* CPU time
+* Wallclock time
+* Memory usage
+* Compiler and platform info
- * Compiler and platform info
"Truth"
+-------
+Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
+viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical solutions
+to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.
- Okada routines are available to generate an elastic solution. The 'best'
- viscoelastic answer will be derived via mesh refinement. Analytical solutions
- to the viscoelastic solution are being sought if anyone has information.
-
-
Added: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/images.txt
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/images.txt (rev 0)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/images.txt 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-strikeslip/benchmark_geometry.png
+http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks/benchmark-strikeslip/benchmark_geometry.png/view
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.header
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.header 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.header 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
language:
rights:
creation_date: 2009/10/18 03:45:05.636 GMT-7
-modification_date: 2009/10/19 11:06:48.282 GMT-7
+modification_date: 2009/10/26 13:51:03.611 GMT-7
excludeFromNav: False
relatedItems:
allowDiscussion: None
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.html
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.html 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.html 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -4,64 +4,32 @@
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.5: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
-<title></title>
+<title>Strike-Slip Benchmark (no gravity)</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://geodynamics.org/cig/portal_javascripts/Plone%20Default/textheworld6.user.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../css/voidspace.css" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
-<div class="document">
+<div class="document" id="strike-slip-benchmark-no-gravity">
+<h1 class="title">Strike-Slip Benchmark (no gravity)</h1>
-
-<p>Strike-Slip Benchmark (no gravity)</p>
-<blockquote>
<p>Benchmark for strike-slip fault without gravity.</p>
-<blockquote>
-<ul>
-<li><dl class="first docutils">
-<dt>Benchmark Description</dt>
-<dd><p class="first last">Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b.</p>
-</dd>
-</dl>
-</li>
-<li><dl class="first docutils">
-<dt>PyLith-0.8 Input</dt>
-<dd><p class="first last">Input files for PyLith-0.8</p>
-</dd>
-</dl>
-</li>
-<li><dl class="first docutils">
-<dt>GeoFEST Input</dt>
-<dd><p class="first last">Input files for GeoFEST</p>
-</dd>
-</dl>
-</li>
-<li><dl class="first docutils">
-<dt>Results</dt>
-<dd><p class="first last">Results from benchmark runs. Place tarballs containing the
+<ul class="simple">
+<li>Benchmark Description
+Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b.</li>
+<li>PyLith-0.8 Input
+Input files for PyLith-0.8</li>
+<li>GeoFEST Input
+Input files for GeoFEST</li>
+<li>Results
+Results from benchmark runs. Place tarballs containing the
requested results in this folder and describe the run in the
-description field.</p>
-</dd>
-</dl>
-</li>
-<li><dl class="first docutils">
-<dt>Plots of Benchmarking Results</dt>
-<dd><p class="first last">Plots of benchmarking results showing global and local errors.</p>
-</dd>
-</dl>
-</li>
-<li><dl class="first docutils">
-<dt>Geometry for Strike-Slip Benchmark</dt>
-<dd><p class="first last">Domain and fault geometry for the strike-slip benchmark.</p>
-</dd>
-</dl>
-</li>
+description field.</li>
+<li>Plots of Benchmarking Results
+Plots of benchmarking results showing global and local errors.</li>
+<li>Geometry for Strike-Slip Benchmark
+Domain and fault geometry for the strike-slip benchmark.</li>
</ul>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-<dl class="docutils">
-<dt>URL</dt>
-<dd><a class="reference external" href="http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks">http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks</a></dd>
-</dl>
+<!-- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks -->
</div>
</body>
</html>
Modified: doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.rst
===================================================================
--- doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.rst 2009-10-26 23:04:54 UTC (rev 15881)
+++ doc/geodynamics.org/benchmarks/trunk/short/strikeslip/index.rst 2009-10-26 23:44:21 UTC (rev 15882)
@@ -1,29 +1,29 @@
Strike-Slip Benchmark (no gravity)
+==================================
- Benchmark for strike-slip fault without gravity.
+Benchmark for strike-slip fault without gravity.
- * Benchmark Description
- Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b.
+* Benchmark Description
+ Benchmark problem description. Formerly known as benchmark 4b.
- * PyLith-0.8 Input
- Input files for PyLith-0.8
+* PyLith-0.8 Input
+ Input files for PyLith-0.8
- * GeoFEST Input
- Input files for GeoFEST
+* GeoFEST Input
+ Input files for GeoFEST
- * Results
- Results from benchmark runs. Place tarballs containing the
- requested results in this folder and describe the run in the
- description field.
+* Results
+ Results from benchmark runs. Place tarballs containing the
+ requested results in this folder and describe the run in the
+ description field.
- * Plots of Benchmarking Results
- Plots of benchmarking results showing global and local errors.
+* Plots of Benchmarking Results
+ Plots of benchmarking results showing global and local errors.
- * Geometry for Strike-Slip Benchmark
- Domain and fault geometry for the strike-slip benchmark.
+* Geometry for Strike-Slip Benchmark
+ Domain and fault geometry for the strike-slip benchmark.
-URL
- http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks
+.. http://geodynamics.org/cig/workinggroups/short/workarea/benchmarks
More information about the CIG-COMMITS
mailing list