[cig-commits] commit: Small edits.

Mercurial hg at geodynamics.org
Fri May 4 11:23:45 PDT 2012


changeset:   120:061f03f57e11
tag:         tip
user:        Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov>
date:        Fri May 04 11:23:32 2012 -0700
files:       faultRup.tex
description:
Small edits.


diff -r c3fd6d615a85 -r 061f03f57e11 faultRup.tex
--- a/faultRup.tex	Fri May 04 11:15:30 2012 -0700
+++ b/faultRup.tex	Fri May 04 11:23:32 2012 -0700
@@ -1638,20 +1638,21 @@ simulations of earthquake rupture propag
   \noindent\includegraphics{figs/savageprescott_profiles}
   \caption{Comparison of displacement profiles perpendicular to the
     fault in the Savage and Prescott benchmark during earthquake
-    cycles 2 and 10. The displacement values shown are relative to the
-    values at the beginning of the earthquake cycle to facilitate
-    comparison between the analytical solution and the numerical
-    models. Both the analytical and numerical simulations require
-    spin-up to reach the steady-state solution, and the numerical
-    models also require spin-up to achieve steady plate motion, which
-    is superimposed on the analytical solution. Both the hexahedral
-    (Hex8) and tetrahedral (Tet4) discretizations resolve the
-    viscoelastic deformation and display excellent agreement with the
-    steady-state solution by the tenth earthquake cycle. The coarser
-    (20 km) resolutions are unable to match the details of the
-    displacement field very close to the fault, but all of the
-    numerical models provide a good fit to the analytical solution far
-    from the fault.}
+    cycles (a) 2 and (b) 10. The displacement values shown are
+    relative to the values at the beginning of the earthquake cycle to
+    facilitate comparison between the analytical solution and the
+    numerical models. Both the analytical and numerical simulations
+    require spin-up to reach the steady-state solution, and the
+    numerical models also require spin-up to achieve steady plate
+    motion, which is superimposed on the analytical solution. Both the
+    hexahedral (Hex8) and tetrahedral (Tet4) discretizations resolve
+    the viscoelastic deformation and display excellent agreement with
+    the steady-state solution by the tenth earthquake cycle. The
+    coarser (20 km) resolutions are unable to match the details of the
+    displacement field at distances less than about one elastic
+    thickness, but all of the numerical models provide a good fit to
+    the analytical solution at distances greater than a 2-3 times the
+    elastic thickness.}
   \label{fig:savage:prescott:profiles}
 \end{figure}
 



More information about the CIG-COMMITS mailing list