[cig-commits] commit: Small edits.
Mercurial
hg at geodynamics.org
Fri May 4 11:23:45 PDT 2012
changeset: 120:061f03f57e11
tag: tip
user: Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov>
date: Fri May 04 11:23:32 2012 -0700
files: faultRup.tex
description:
Small edits.
diff -r c3fd6d615a85 -r 061f03f57e11 faultRup.tex
--- a/faultRup.tex Fri May 04 11:15:30 2012 -0700
+++ b/faultRup.tex Fri May 04 11:23:32 2012 -0700
@@ -1638,20 +1638,21 @@ simulations of earthquake rupture propag
\noindent\includegraphics{figs/savageprescott_profiles}
\caption{Comparison of displacement profiles perpendicular to the
fault in the Savage and Prescott benchmark during earthquake
- cycles 2 and 10. The displacement values shown are relative to the
- values at the beginning of the earthquake cycle to facilitate
- comparison between the analytical solution and the numerical
- models. Both the analytical and numerical simulations require
- spin-up to reach the steady-state solution, and the numerical
- models also require spin-up to achieve steady plate motion, which
- is superimposed on the analytical solution. Both the hexahedral
- (Hex8) and tetrahedral (Tet4) discretizations resolve the
- viscoelastic deformation and display excellent agreement with the
- steady-state solution by the tenth earthquake cycle. The coarser
- (20 km) resolutions are unable to match the details of the
- displacement field very close to the fault, but all of the
- numerical models provide a good fit to the analytical solution far
- from the fault.}
+ cycles (a) 2 and (b) 10. The displacement values shown are
+ relative to the values at the beginning of the earthquake cycle to
+ facilitate comparison between the analytical solution and the
+ numerical models. Both the analytical and numerical simulations
+ require spin-up to reach the steady-state solution, and the
+ numerical models also require spin-up to achieve steady plate
+ motion, which is superimposed on the analytical solution. Both the
+ hexahedral (Hex8) and tetrahedral (Tet4) discretizations resolve
+ the viscoelastic deformation and display excellent agreement with
+ the steady-state solution by the tenth earthquake cycle. The
+ coarser (20 km) resolutions are unable to match the details of the
+ displacement field at distances less than about one elastic
+ thickness, but all of the numerical models provide a good fit to
+ the analytical solution at distances greater than a 2-3 times the
+ elastic thickness.}
\label{fig:savage:prescott:profiles}
\end{figure}
More information about the CIG-COMMITS
mailing list