[cig-commits] r22518 - seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk

dkomati1 at geodynamics.org dkomati1 at geodynamics.org
Sat Jul 6 07:26:02 PDT 2013


Author: dkomati1
Date: 2013-07-06 07:26:02 -0700 (Sat, 06 Jul 2013)
New Revision: 22518

Modified:
   seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt
Log:
updated the todo list


Modified: seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt
===================================================================
--- seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt	2013-07-06 14:02:18 UTC (rev 22517)
+++ seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt	2013-07-06 14:26:02 UTC (rev 22518)
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
 
 - suggestion 41:
 ----------------
-avoid receivers located in PML region when using PML in adjoint simulation
+make sure users avoid receivers located in PML region when using PML in adjoint simulation (i.e. add a stop statement if a receiver
+is detected inside a PML element)
 
 - suggestion 40:
 ----------------
@@ -38,7 +39,7 @@
 - suggestion 35:
 ----------------
 
-Add full viscoelastic kernels, undoing full attenuation
+Add full viscoelastic kernels in 3D_Cartesian, undoing full attenuation (already done in 3D_GLOBE in July 2013)
 
 - suggestion 38:
 ----------------
@@ -53,8 +54,8 @@
 - suggestion 39:
 ----------------
 
-doublecheck carefully file memory_eval.f90 in both SPECFEM3D_Cartesian and SPECFEM3D_Globe
-(in particular now that C-PML has been implemented in SPECFEM3D_Cartesian), as both codes have undergone lots of changes in the past few months
+doublecheck carefully file memory_eval.f90 in SPECFEM3D_Cartesian (already done and fixed for SPECFEM3D_Globe by Dimitri in July 2013).
+(in particular now that C-PML has been implemented in SPECFEM3D_Cartesian), as the code has undergone lots of changes in the past few months
 and thus new big arrays have been used, in particular for C-PML (but only in the CPML layers for these arrays, not in the rest of the model);
 Thus we should make sure that all these arrays are taken into account in the memory estimate computed in memory_eval.f90.
 
@@ -63,7 +64,6 @@
 CPML :
 ------------------------------------------------
 
-
 - suggestion 19:
 ----------------
 



More information about the CIG-COMMITS mailing list