[cig-commits] r21586 - seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk

[dkomati1 at geodynamics.org]

Author: dkomati1
Date: 2013-03-19 16:24:19 -0700 (Tue, 19 Mar 2013)
New Revision: 21586

Modified:
   seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt
Log:
more precise suggestion about C-PML weights


Modified: seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt
===================================================================
--- seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt	2013-03-19 23:22:47 UTC (rev 21585)
+++ seismo/3D/SPECFEM3D/trunk/todo_list_please_dont_remove.txt	2013-03-19 23:24:19 UTC (rev 21586)
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@
 because C-PML elements will be more expensive because they will compute more terms and will solve more equations (for the memory
 variables / convolution terms) thus we should assign a higher weight to them when we call Scotch
 
+the "elmnts_load" array up in decompose_mesh/part_decompose_mesh.f90 (around line 1432)
+currently does not take into account C-PML elements weights. The matching array in the code is
+called "CPML_type" and is defined as follows: 1 = face, 2 = edge, 3 = corner. 
+
 that is similar to what Daniel does for acoustic elements in the current version of SPECFEM3D: he uses a weight of 1 for acoustic
 elements and 3 (or something like that) for elastic elements, which use a 3D vector instead of a scalar.