[cig-commits] commit 2285 by bangerth to /var/svn/dealii/aspect
dealii.demon at gmail.com
dealii.demon at gmail.com
Fri Jan 31 14:58:02 PST 2014
Revision 2285
Unify using abbreviated first names.
U trunk/aspect/doc/manual/manual.tex
http://www.dealii.org/websvn/revision.php?repname=Aspect+Repository&path=%2F&rev=2285&peg=2285
Diff:
Modified: trunk/aspect/doc/manual/manual.tex
===================================================================
--- trunk/aspect/doc/manual/manual.tex 2014-01-30 03:34:24 UTC (rev 2284)
+++ trunk/aspect/doc/manual/manual.tex 2014-01-31 22:57:59 UTC (rev 2285)
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
this software:
egin{lstlisting}[frame=single,language=tex]
@Article{KHB12,
- author = {Martin Kronbichler and Timo Heister and Wolfgang Bangerth},
+ author = {M. Kronbichler and T. Heister and W. Bangerth},
title = {High Accuracy Mantle Convection Simulation through Modern Numerical Methods},
journal = {Geophysics Journal International},
year = 2012,
@@ -2452,7 +2452,7 @@
\item What is the domain (geometry)?
\item What happens at the boundary for each variable involved (boundary
conditions)?
- \item How did it look at the beginning (initial conditions)?
+ \item How did it look at the beginning (initial conditions)?
\end{itemize}
For each of these questions, there are one or more input parameters (sometimes
grouped into sections) that allow you to specify what you want. For example, to
@@ -3313,7 +3313,7 @@
instead (the mesh chosen above with up to 7 refinement levels after some time
is fine enough to resolve this). We can achieve this in the same way as in the
previous section by choosing $lpha=10^{-10}$ and setting
-egin{lstlisting}[frame=single,language=prmfile,escapechar=\%]
+egin{lstlisting}[frame=single,language=prmfile,escapechar=\%]
subsection Gravity model
set Model name = vertical % \index[prmindex]{Model name} \index[prmindexfull]{Gravity model!Model name} %
@@ -3389,11 +3389,11 @@
Solving temperature system... 0 iterations.
Rebuilding Stokes preconditioner...
Solving Stokes system... 21 iterations.
-[...]
+[...]
\end{lstlisting}
\ldots{}but then increases quickly to around 2 million as the solution develops
some structure and, after time $t=0.003$ where we allow for an additional
-refinement, increases to over 10 million where it then hovers between 8 and 14
+refinement, increases to over 10 million where it then hovers between 8 and 14
million with a maximum of 15,147,534. Clearly, even on a reasonably quick
machine, this will take some time: running this on a machine bought in 2011,
doing the 10,000 time steps to get to $t=0.0219$ takes approximately 484,000
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@
extit{et al.} stated presciently in their abstract that `` extit{\ldots good
agreement is found for the initial rise of the unstable lower layer; however, the timing
and location of the later smaller-scale instabilities may differ between
- methods.}''
+ methods.}''
To understand what is happening here, note that the first peak in these plots
corresponds to the plume that rises along the left edge of the domain and whose
evolution is primarily determined by the large-scale shape of the initial
@@ -4306,7 +4306,7 @@
set Function constants = pi=3.14159
set Function expression = 0.5*(1+tanh((0.2+0.02*cos(pi*x/0.9142)-z)/0.02))
end
-end
+end
\end{lstlisting}
This replaces the discontinuous initial conditions with a smoothed out version
with a half width of around 0.01. Using this, the root mean square plot now
More information about the CIG-COMMITS
mailing list