[CIG-SEISMO] Fwd: Re: SPECFEM3D V2.0

[Carl Tape]

Dear Javed,

You attached a source file in the format of a CMTSOLUTION file. This is used
with the 3D code. The 2D code uses a different style of input (SOURCE).
Please try running the default simulation and make sure that it works. Or
send the SOURCE file that you used.

Also, make sure to test the latest version that is on the CIG SVN server
(svn checkout ...).

Carl

---------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Tape
Assistant Professor
Geophysical Institute
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Phone: 907-474-5456
Email: carltape at gi.alaska.edu
Web: http://www.giseis.alaska.edu/input/carl/
---------------------------------------------------------------


On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:42 AM, <iqbalj at ujf-grenoble.fr> wrote:

>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: iqbalj at ujf-grenoble.fr
> To: Dimitri Komatitsch <dimitri.komatitsch at get.obs-mip.fr>
> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:03:59 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CIG-SEISMO] SPECFEM3D V2.0
> Quoting Dimitri Komatitsch <dimitri.komatitsch at get.obs-mip.fr>:
> Here are the input and out put files. I want to apply single force source
> (with delta dirac function properties)
> Thank you aganin
> Javed IQBAL
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your message. This is probably a bug.
>> (the fact that the time values in column #1 do not vary in the second
>> example makes no sense)
>> Please send us your input file, i.e., the file called "DATA/Par_file".
>>
>> Could somebody then have a look? (maybe Daniel at Princeton? or else I
>> could ask Mila to have a look, although she mostly uses SPECFEM3D_GLOBE and
>> not SPECFEM3D).
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Dimitri.
>>
>> On 04/29/2011 12:15 PM, iqbalj at ujf-grenoble.fr wrote:
>>
>>> I am new user to SPECFEM3D V2
>>> Does any one suggest solution of the problem I amfacing?
>>> For some receiver (Stations) output time history is ok and looks line
>>>
>>>  -9.5000003E-05    5.9532680E-25
>>>  -8.5500003E-05    5.9531230E-25
>>>  -7.5999997E-05    5.9528331E-25
>>>  -6.6499997E-05    5.9525437E-25
>>>  -5.7000001E-05    5.9522558E-25
>>>  -4.7500002E-05    5.9519679E-25
>>>  -3.7999998E-05    5.9516819E-25
>>>  -2.8500001E-05    5.9513954E-25
>>>  -1.8999999E-05    5.9511095E-25
>>>  -9.4999996E-06    5.9508260E-25
>>>    0.000000        5.9505420E-25
>>>   9.4999996E-06    5.9502585E-25
>>>   1.8999999E-05    5.9499770E-25
>>>   2.8500001E-05    5.9496959E-25
>>>   3.7999998E-05    5.9494144E-25
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But for some stations output is very strange and looks like
>>>
>>>   -25259.27         92.52207
>>>   -25259.27         38.20763
>>>   -25259.27        -14.64564
>>>   -25259.27        -66.15791
>>>   -25259.27        -118.3264
>>>   -25259.27        -170.2008
>>>   -25259.27        -221.6914
>>>   -25259.27        -271.9910
>>>   -25259.27        -323.8615
>>>   -25259.27        -374.9527
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>>> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dimitri Komatitsch - dimitri.komatitsch aT get.obs-mip.fr
>> Professor, University of Toulouse and Institut universitaire de France,
>> CNRS UMR 5563 GET, France   http://www.univ-pau.fr/~dkomati1
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-seismo/attachments/20110506/4659bc4b/attachment.htm