[CIG-SEISMO] bug report:./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x261): additional relocation overflows omitted from the output

zhaoming zm1984 at mail.iggcas.ac.cn
Sat Aug 25 07:32:27 PDT 2012


Dear all,
I encountered this problem when compiling the solver in SPECFEM3D_GLOBE_V5.0.1:

obj/specfem3D.o: In function `MAIN__':
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0xbb): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0xcc): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0xdf): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x120): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x1c8): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x1e0): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x1f8): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x213): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x22e): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x246): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.bss'
./specfem3D.f90:(.text+0x261): additional relocation overflows omitted from the output

What could it be?Does anyone have any idea?

Best Wishes!
Ming




祝 
好
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-seismo/attachments/20120825/1be8bc70/attachment.htm 


More information about the CIG-SEISMO mailing list