[CIG-SEISMO] Asking SPECFEM2D SU format (other email)

Dimitri Komatitsch komatitsch at lma.cnrs-mrs.fr
Thu Aug 29 04:47:41 PDT 2013


Dear all,

Would it make sense to rename the binary files from *.bin to *.bin.su or 
to *_bin.su then (when SU_FORMAT is on), to avoid confusion?

Or is it obvious that SU format is just a binary array?

Let me know if you would like me to change that.

Thanks,
Dimitri.

On 07/10/2013 06:55 PM, Yang Luo wrote:
> Hi there,

> I have been away from the group for quite a while, so I'm not sure
> whether anyone has modified that portion of the code.

> If no one has, the *.bin files are the seismograms in seismic unix
> format, if you turn the SU_FORMAT on.

> Sometimes you need to swapbytes, before you can view it correctly in SU.

> Thanks,
> Yang
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Jungrak SON <jrson2011 at gmail.com
> <mailto:jrson2011 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     To whom it may concern,
>
>     Hi, My name is Jungrak Son who is MS student in Texas and have tried
>     to use SPECFEM2D. Thankfully I found this precious software package
>     and decided to prepare my thesis with using it. I made my own
>     examples successfully, but I still have a little problem.
>
>     What I have done is below.
>
>     << SU_FORMAT = .true.   # output single precision binary seismograms
>     in Seismic Unix format   >>
>
>     I also make << save_binary_seismograms_single = . true. >> .
>
>     However, I cannot find any file of extension *.su . I couldn't open
>     " Ux_file_single.bin " and " Uz_file_single.bin " . I know how to
>     get seismogram in ASCII format, using xmgrace, but I need to open it
>     Seismic Unix.
>
>     One more thing, Can I use CUBIT not only for 3D but for 2D? The
>     external 2D mesh example "canyon" was a little different from CUBIT
>     output file and I could not find any python files in the package.
>     Actually I am very good at using CUBIT, but SPECFEM3D seems much
>     difficult to understand.
>
>
>     I'm sorry to bother you, but studying SPECFEM alone is a little
>     tough. Would you please help me to overcome these problem? Thanks
>     for considering.
>
>     Sincerely,
>
>
>     - Jungrak Son
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>     CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org <mailto:CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org>
>     http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>

-- 
Dimitri Komatitsch
CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS), Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics,
UPR 7051, Marseille, France    http://komatitsch.free.fr


More information about the CIG-SEISMO mailing list