[CIG-SEISMO] Examples in new version not updated.

emanuele casarotti emanuele.casarotti at gmail.com
Mon Aug 25 11:56:28 PDT 2014


Hi John

can you please refer to the examples here https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem3d/tree/devel/CUBIT_GEOCUBIT/examples


topography_models is your case but you could also find useful preexisting_mesh




I will work on the example of saint-helens https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem3d/tree/devel/EXAMPLES/Mount_StHelens

to fit with the new files.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:14 PM, John Cooper <nhojcooper at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Emanuele,
> The example is here.
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/g2i08l18ohym0p2/Mount_StHelens.zip?dl=0
> This same example as is from SPECFEM3D. just copied cubit2specfem3d.py and
> boundary_definition.py to it.
> Thanks
> Regards
> J
> cig-seismo-bounces at geodynamics.org; on behalf of; emanuele casarotti <
> emanuele.casarotti at gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon 8/25/2014 3:13 PM
> To: cig-seismo at geodynamics.org
> Cc: cig-seismo at geodynamics.org
> hi all,
> is it still open?
> the “indent” error in python means that there are some issues in the format
> of file (i.e. more/less spaces). if the default examples run fine also you
> case should work. Can you provide a full example of you case?
> Emanuele
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:23 PM, John Cooper <nhojcooper at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Carl,
>>
>> Thanks for responding. The run_this_example works fine. The problem comes
>> when I make mesh and then want to use  boundary_definition, give "indent"
>> errors. I define it manually but the same is the case with cubit2specfem3d.
>> so I can't export even if I make define boundary conditions manually.I
>> guess there is problem with the paths somewhere, but could not understand
>> where i could be.
>>
>> J.
>>
>> cig-seismo-bounces at geodynamics.org; on behalf of; Carl Tape <
>> carltape at gi.alaska.edu>
>>
>> Sent: Tue 8/12/2014 8:42 PM
>>
>> To: cig-seismo at geodynamics.org
>>
>>
>> > Dear John,
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Did you try the default example? As far as I know, this has been
>> working, and the instructions
>>
>> > there should match the names of the scripts. (The process.sh script has
>> been gone since
>>
>> > before your email.) I just now checked everything in the latest
>> developmental version (including
>>
>> > generating the mesh).
>>
>> >
>>
>> > The checkout command is:
>>
>> > git clone --branch devel https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem3d.git
>>
>> >
>>
>> > It is possible that the other examples do need updating, but it's always
>> best to make sure that > the default example works for you.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > We certainly want to have functional instructions, so thank you for your
>> feedback!
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Thanks,
>>
>> > Carl
>>
>> >
>>
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > Carl Tape
>>
>> > Assistant Professor
>>
>> > Geophysical Institute (office 413D)
>>
>> > University of Alaska Fairbanks
>>
>> > Phone: 907-474-5456
>>
>> > Email: carltape at gi.alaska.edu
>>
>> > Web: http://www.giseis.alaska.edu/input/carl/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:50 PM, John Cooper <nhojcooper at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear SPECFEM Dev,
>>
>> >
>>
>> > I am shifting from the old version to the new stable version. But I
>>
>> > found that the EXAMPLES are not updated accordingly with the changes.
>>
>> > boundary_definition, cubit2specfem3d and process.sh are no more
>>
>> > available (with the examples) but the README is still the same as was
>>
>> > for the old version. Therefore I guess, it's no more the same, where
>>
>> > we use e.g mesh_mount.py to create and export in one go. process.sh is
>>
>> > mentioned but not available. Would it be possible to have updated
>>
>> > version of instructions that could help us in knowing what procedural
>> changes are made?
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Thanks in advance.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Kind regards,
>>
>> > J.C
>>
>> >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>>
>> > CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>>
>> > CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>>
>> > http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>>
>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>>
>> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-seismo/attachments/20140825/8e56f582/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CIG-SEISMO mailing list