[CIG-SEISMO] single force solution
Hom Nath Gharti
hgharti at princeton.edu
Wed Apr 12 04:06:15 PDT 2017
Hi Sévan,
I am about to finish new point force implementation. I will let you know
once it is ready for testing.
Best,
Hom Nath
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Dimitri Komatitsch <
komatitsch at lma.cnrs-mrs.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi Sevan,
>
> I guess you can keep cc'ing the list because it is an issue Clément,
> Vadim, Paul, Sébastien and I have been facing as well in our coupling
> with external codes, thus we are interested in knowing more about the
> potential problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Best wishes,
> Dimitri.
>
> On 04/12/2017 11:24 AM, Sevan Adourian wrote:
> > Hi Hom Nath,
> >
> > Thanks for your answer and concern. Since you suggest something that is
> > not directly "specfem related", can I send you directly an email so that
> > we can discuss it? And then I can post the solution once we'll find it,
> > in order to close the topic!
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Sévan
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Hom Nath Gharti <hgharti at princeton.edu
> > <mailto:hgharti at princeton.edu>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sévan,
> >
> > Do you also switch the orientations of source and receiver?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hom Nath
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Sevan Adourian
> > <sevan.adourian at berkeley.edu <mailto:sevan.adourian at berkeley.edu>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi cig-seismo community,
> >
> > I'm trying to compute Green's functions using Specfem3D-Globe,
> > using a single force point source solution coupled with a source
> > time function that basically represents a filtered Dirac delta.
> > In order to test my implementation, I imposed a source at a
> > point A and looked at the obtained Green's function at a
> > receiver B. Then, I switched the position of the source and the
> > receiver and compared the 2 in order to check the reciprocity of
> > those Green's functions.
> >
> > It turned out that I have a perfect reciprocity (in the
> > frequency band that correspond to my filtered Dirac delta) only
> > on the component in which I input the force, while the other
> > components don't quite match.
> >
> > I strongly suspected a reference frame rotation issue, so I
> > tried to input the force in the global xyz coordinate system
> > (i.e. adding the force directly in the accel_crust_mantle array
> > in the comp_add_sources subroutine, without multiplying with the
> > nu_source matrix) and looked at the Green's functions in this
> > xyz coordinates system (ie, directly writing in the seismograms
> > structure the values of ux, uy and uz computed in the
> > compute_seismogram subroutine), but I still have this issue.
> > Would anyone have an idea of where this probable rotation issue
> > could come from?
> >
> > I'm working on specfem3D-Globe v6.0.0.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your help!
> > Sévan
> >
> > --
> > Sevan Adourian
> > Masters Student at Ecole Normale Superieure de Paris
> > sevan.adourian at ens.fr <mailto:sevan.adourian at ens.fr>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CIG-SEISMO mailing list
> > CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org <mailto:CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org>
> > http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
> > <http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sevan Adourian
> > Masters Student at Ecole Normale Superieure de Paris
> > sevan.adourian at ens.fr <mailto:sevan.adourian at ens.fr>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CIG-SEISMO mailing list
> > CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
> > http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
> >
>
> --
> Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS)
> Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France
> http://komatitsch.free.fr
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-seismo/attachments/20170412/ec2a63b4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CIG-SEISMO
mailing list