From ljhwang at ucdavis.edu Wed Oct 3 14:08:56 2018 From: ljhwang at ucdavis.edu (Lorraine Hwang) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:08:56 -0700 Subject: [CIG-SEISMO] CIG Wanted: Your 2018 Fall AGU Abstract Message-ID: Congratulations to all CIG community members with accepted abstracts for this year’s 2018 Fall AGU Meeting. Help your colleagues and attendees find your research by listing it on the CIG website: https://geodynamics.org/cig/events/calendar/agu-2018/2018-agu-abstracts/ To do so, please reply to this email events at geodynamcis.org by simply cutting and pasting your acceptance information AND your link to your abstract. e.g., https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm18/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/419977 Abstract ID: 419977 Abstract Title: A Decade+ of Open Software Practice at CIG Final Paper Number: IN43C-2835 Presentation Type: Poster Session Date and Time: Thursday, 13 December 2018; 13:40 - 18:00 Session Number and Title: IN43C: FAIR Data Is Not Enough: Communicating Data Quality and Making Analytical Code FAIR Posters Best, -Lorraine ***************************** Lorraine Hwang, Ph.D. Associate Director, CIG 530.752.3656 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From yingz at vt.edu Thu Oct 4 20:05:54 2018 From: yingz at vt.edu (Ying Zhou) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 23:05:54 -0400 Subject: [CIG-SEISMO] CIG Wanted: Your 2018 Fall AGU Abstract In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Lorraine -- Here are two (seismology) abstracts. Thanks, Ying ---- https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm18/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/386117 Abstract ID: 386117 Abstract Title: Dynamics of Stagnant Slabs in the Mantle Transition Zone Final Paper Number: DI22A-05 Presentation Type: Oral Session Date and Time: Tuesday, 11 December 2018; 10:20 - 12:20 Presentation Length: 11:20 - 11:35 Session Number and Title: DI22A: Subducting Slabs in the Mantle II Location: Marriott Marquis; Archives https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm18/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/417990 Abstract ID: 417990 Abstract Title: Imaging the Sharpness of the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary (LAB) Final Paper Number: T54B-08 Presentation Type: Oral Session Date and Time: Friday, 14 December 2018; 16:00 - 18:00 Presentation Length: 17:45 - 18:00 Session Number and Title: T54B: Structure and Dynamics of the Upper Mantle: Characterizing the Lithosphere–Asthenosphere System from Crust to Transition Zone III Location: Marriott Marquis; Liberty L ---- On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Lorraine Hwang wrote: > > Congratulations to all CIG community members with accepted abstracts for this year’s 2018 Fall AGU Meeting. Help your colleagues and attendees find your research by listing it on the CIG website: > > https://geodynamics.org/cig/events/calendar/agu-2018/2018-agu-abstracts/ > > To do so, please reply to this email events at geodynamcis.org by simply cutting and pasting your acceptance information AND your link to your abstract. > > e.g., > > > https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm18/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/419977 > > Abstract ID: 419977 > Abstract Title: A Decade+ of Open Software Practice at CIG > Final Paper Number: IN43C-2835 > Presentation Type: Poster > Session Date and Time: Thursday, 13 December 2018; 13:40 - 18:00 > Session Number and Title: IN43C: FAIR Data Is Not Enough: Communicating Data Quality and Making Analytical Code FAIR Posters > > > > > Best, > -Lorraine > > ***************************** > Lorraine Hwang, Ph.D. > Associate Director, CIG > 530.752.3656 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CIG-SEISMO mailing list > CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org > http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Moritz.Fehr at dmt-group.com Tue Oct 9 22:27:18 2018 From: Moritz.Fehr at dmt-group.com (Fehr, Moritz) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 05:27:18 +0000 Subject: [CIG-SEISMO] Problem with external velocity model Message-ID: Hi, I have some issues using an external velocity model with ”low“ velocities. The model size is 3 x 3 x 2.52 km and the mesh size is 40 m in all directions. The velocity model is discretized with 40m as well. If I use my initial velocity model with minimum velocities Vp = 2263 m/s and Vs = 1307 m/s the simulation works fine. In the next step I wanted to implement a low velocity patch within the initial velocity model (see: v_model_patch.png) to investigate the influence of the low velocity body. The minimum velocities are Vp = 955 m/s and Vs = 555 m/s (blue). The problem is that SPECFEM do not detect these low velocities (see output_solver.txt) and the simulation provides the same results as the initial simulation. I also tried different mesh sizes and velocity model spacing but the problem still remains. Do anybody have an idea about the origin of that issue? Thanks Moritz PS: I am using SPECFEM3D Cartesian (Version 3.0) with two GPUs (Tesla K40m) and 28 CPUs. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sitz der Gesellschaft/Headquarters: DMT GmbH & Co. KG * Am Technologiepark 1 * 45307 Essen * Deutschland/Germany Registergericht/County Court: Amtsgericht Essen * HRA 9091 * USt-ID DE 253275653 Komplementär/Fully Liable Partner: DMT Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, Essen Registergericht/County Court: Amtsgericht Essen * HRB 20420 Geschäftsführer/Board of Directors: Dr. Maik Tiedemann (Vorsitzender/CEO), Jens-Peter Lux, Ulrich Pröpper Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Jürgen Himmelsbach TÜV NORD GROUP ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Diese Nachricht enthält vertrauliche Informationen und ist nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der Empfänger sind, sollten Sie die E-Mail nicht verbreiten, verteilen oder diese E-Mail kopieren. Benachrichtigen Sie bitte den Absender per E-Mail, wenn Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben und löschen dann diese E-Mail von Ihrem System. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the recipient. If you are not the recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: output_solver.txt URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: gpu_device_mem_usage.txt URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: gpu_device_info.txt URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: output_mesher.txt URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: v_model_patch.PNG Type: image/png Size: 56766 bytes Desc: v_model_patch.PNG URL: From komatitsch at lma.cnrs-mrs.fr Wed Oct 10 04:29:35 2018 From: komatitsch at lma.cnrs-mrs.fr (Dimitri Komatitsch) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:29:35 +0200 Subject: [CIG-SEISMO] Problem with external velocity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <68274d7a-d408-34f3-a3da-766170601ec6@lma.cnrs-mrs.fr> Hi Moritz, Are you using the internal mesher, or an external model and external mesh? Thanks, Dimitri. On 10/10/2018 07:27 AM, Fehr, Moritz wrote: > Hi, > > I have some issues using an external velocity model with ”low“ > velocities. The model size is 3 x 3 x 2.52 km and the mesh size is 40 m > in all directions. The velocity model is discretized with 40m as well. > > If  I  use my initial velocity model with minimum velocities Vp = 2263 > m/s and Vs = 1307 m/s the simulation works fine. In the next step I > wanted to implement a low velocity patch within the initial velocity > model (see: v_model_patch.png) to investigate the influence of the low > velocity body. The minimum velocities are Vp = 955 m/s and Vs = 555 m/s > (blue). The problem is that SPECFEM do not detect these low velocities > (see output_solver.txt) and the simulation provides the same results as > the initial simulation. I also tried different mesh sizes and velocity > model spacing but the problem still remains. Do anybody have an idea > about the origin of that issue? > > Thanks > > Moritz > > PS: I am using SPECFEM3D Cartesian (Version 3.0) with two GPUs (Tesla > K40m) and 28 CPUs. > > *___________________________________________________________________________________________________* > *Sitz der Gesellschaft/Headquarters:* DMT GmbH & Co. KG * Am > Technologiepark 1 * 45307 Essen * Deutschland/Germany > *Registergericht/County Court:* Amtsgericht Essen * HRA 9091 * USt-ID DE > 253275653 *Komplementär/Fully Liable Partner:* DMT > Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, Essen *Registergericht/County Court:* > Amtsgericht Essen * HRB 20420 *Geschäftsführer/Board of Directors:* Dr. > Maik Tiedemann (Vorsitzender/CEO), Jens-Peter Lux, Ulrich Pröpper > *Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates/Chairman of the Supervisory Board:* > Jürgen Himmelsbach *TÜV NORD GROUP* > *___________________________________________________________________________________________________* > > > Diese Nachricht enthält vertrauliche Informationen und ist nur für den > Empfänger bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der Empfänger sind, sollten Sie die > E-Mail nicht verbreiten, verteilen oder diese E-Mail kopieren. > Benachrichtigen Sie bitte den Absender per E-Mail, wenn Sie diese E-Mail > irrtümlich erhalten haben und löschen dann diese E-Mail von Ihrem System. > > This message contains confidential information and is intended only for > the recipient. If you are not the recipient you should not disseminate, > distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by > e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this > e-mail from your system. > > > _______________________________________________ > CIG-SEISMO mailing list > CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org > http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo > -- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr From avinash07guddu at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 11:18:22 2018 From: avinash07guddu at gmail.com (Avinash Nayak) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 23:48:22 +0530 Subject: [CIG-SEISMO] SPECFEM3D internal mesher Message-ID: Hi, I am new to SPECFEM3D. I have 2 questions on this software and I will be very grateful for your help. 1) Meshing with CUBIT allows one to assign different tomography files with different discretization intervals to different elements of the mesh. Is it possible to use the internal mesher xmeshfem3D in the same way with more than one tomography file ? Any working example will be really helpful. 2) Does the internal mesher work with perfectly matched layer (CPML) ? Chapter 4 says xmeshfem3D generated meshes don't support CPML yet but the example mesh files for xmeshfem3D have some lines with "THICKNESS_OF_X_PML", etc although the PML_CONDITIONS flag in these examples is .false. Thanks for your help. Regards, Avinash -- Avinash Nayak, Research Associate, Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From komatitsch at lma.cnrs-mrs.fr Thu Oct 25 14:02:29 2018 From: komatitsch at lma.cnrs-mrs.fr (Dimitri Komatitsch) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 23:02:29 +0200 Subject: [CIG-SEISMO] SPECFEM3D internal mesher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Avinash, Regarding 1) I am not sure (let me cc Vadim to see if he knows). Regarding 2) you are right, I added full support for CPMLs to the internal mesher a few months ago, but forgot to remove the sentence from the users manual. I have just removed it tonight. Thanks for pointing this out. Best regards, Dimitri. On 10/25/18 8:18 PM, Avinash Nayak wrote: > Hi, > I am new to SPECFEM3D. I have 2 questions on this software and I will be > very grateful for your help. > 1) Meshing with CUBIT allows one to assign different tomography files > with different discretization intervals to different elements of the > mesh. Is it possible to use the internal mesher xmeshfem3D in the same > way with more than one tomography file ? Any working example will be > really helpful. > 2) Does the internal mesher  work with perfectly matched layer (CPML) ? > Chapter 4 says xmeshfem3D generated meshes don't support CPML yet but > the example mesh files for xmeshfem3D have some lines with > "THICKNESS_OF_X_PML", etc although the PML_CONDITIONS flag in these > examples is .false. > Thanks for your help. > Regards, > Avinash > > -- > Avinash Nayak, > Research Associate, > Department of Geoscience, > University of Wisconsin, Madison > > _______________________________________________ > CIG-SEISMO mailing list > CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org > http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo > -- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr