[CIG-SHORT] Adaptive time stepping in PyLith
Brad Aagaard
baagaard at usgs.gov
Sat Sep 6 19:18:55 PDT 2008
Tabrez Ali wrote:
> I just want to confirm:
>
> 1. If adaptive time stepping factors in the relaxation time.
> 2. It can be used safely when we have velocity BC's in place
>
> Also,
>
> - I just ran an example having velocity BC's (total_time=1.0*year)
> with a fixed time step of 0.1*year and it runs fine.
>
> - With adaptive time stepping (max_dt=1.0*year; adapt_skip=10) it
> also runs fine and seems to take a time step of 0.088*year.
>
> - But if I use max_dt=5.0*year (adapt_skip=10) then things go wrong
> as the solution fails to converge. Even though it appears as if the
> time step it takes is 0.088*year (from looking at the "Finishing
> advancing solution from ..." info).
>
> Now I have checked everything twice and am confused as to how is this
> even possible. Why in one case (max_dt=1.0*year) the solution
> converges and in the second case (max_dt=5.0*year) it doesnt even
> when the time step PyLith seems to take appears to be the same
> (0.088*year) in both cases.
This really sounds like a bug. I will look into it as soon as I get a
chance.
Brad
More information about the CIG-SHORT
mailing list