[CIG-SHORT] Intermediate Results

Charles Williams C.Williams at gns.cri.nz
Wed Mar 6 14:30:32 PST 2013


Hi Bobby,

I'm not quite sure what you have in mind.  If you're running any sort of viscoelastic problem, you would need to save the entire state at the end of each run.  I don't see what benefit there would be from doing this, since you would still need to finish each run to get all the state variables at the end of each chunk, and then feed them into the next simulation as initial state variables.

If your problem is completely elastic, I suppose you could run them in the way you're suggesting, and then use linear superposition to obtain the final result.  What is your reason for wanting to break up the simulation?

Cheers,
Charles


On 7/03/2013, at 11:22 AM, BOK10 at pitt.edu wrote:

> Is it possible to split a simulation into parts? I'm running my model for
> 400 years at 5 year time intervals, but is it possible to split it to 100
> year chunks and run them serially?
> 
> Bobby
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SHORT mailing list
> CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org
> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short

Charles A. Williams
Scientist
GNS Science
1 Fairway Drive, Avalon
PO Box 30368
Lower Hutt  5040
New Zealand
ph (office): 0064-4570-4566
fax (office): 0064-4570-4600
C.Williams at gns.cri.nz


Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential.
If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us.
Do not copy or disclose the contents.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-short/attachments/20130307/fc58726d/attachment.htm 


More information about the CIG-SHORT mailing list