[CIG-SHORT] a new question on PyLith

[Brad Aagaard]

Yasemin,

The .xmf files contain links to the HDF5 files. The links are relative 
to the directory in which PyLith was run. This means you must start 
ParaView in the directory in which PyLith was run. In general, this is 
done from the command line in a terminal.

Additionally, with recent versions of ParaView you will be given the 
option of whether to us a Xdmf3 reader or Xdmf. Select the Xdmf reader 
(usually it shows up at the bottom of the list).

Regards,
Brad


On 03/16/2017 08:25 AM, Yasemin Korkusuz wrote:
> Dear Prof.Aagaard,
>
> When I get results for SCEC tpv205, first I checked time dependent
> graphs which are compared by Kaneko's results etc. As I have written to
> you there is no problem with those results.
>
> On the other hand, I could not visualize ' .xmf ' files by Paraview or
> Visit. I also tried to get " .VTK" outputs, but again I got problems.
> You emphasized in the Pylith manual that using HDF5 files (so .xmf) is
> much better, so I would like to use it. In your original tpv205
> examples, the results are already given by HDF5 outputs, so I shoul duse
> those .xmf files for visualisations.
>
>
> My problem is below:
> When  I tried to open .xmf files on my ubuntu,"Paraview" immediately
> closes itself.
> (As I checked "Step03.cfg" 3D example, Pylith and  Paraview are working
> well, regarding one of your videos on Paraview)
> Therefore, I tried to plot .xmf results using Paraview and Visit on my
> Windows10, as well. On the other hand, I could not get anything by
> Visit, but I could only get the error message which are in the
> attachment when I used Paraview.I got that error when I try to use
> "Apply" option after openning the file  "tet4_200m.xmf".
>
>
> (Note: As you may remember I needed to do some modifications in Entity
> IDs in the .jou files of the original tpv205 problem to create geometry
> by Trelis)
>
> I will be looking forward to seeing your suggestions
> Thank you very much
>
> Yasemin Korkusuz Öztürk
>
>
>
>
> 2017-02-24 0:12 GMT+03:00 Yasemin Korkusuz <yaseminkrksz at gmail.com
> <mailto:yaseminkrksz at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Dear Aagaard,
>
>     Thanks a lot for your reply. It is very nice to hear that
>     complicated fault geometries can be adapted.
>
>     Best regards
>     Yasemin
>
>
>
>     24 Şub 2017 Cum, saat 00:09 tarihinde Brad Aagaard
>     <baagaard at usgs.gov <mailto:baagaard at usgs.gov>> şunu yazdı:
>
>         On 02/23/2017 10:50 AM, Yasemin Korkusuz wrote:
>         > Dear Aagaard,
>         >
>         > After your last suggestion, and running three Python files
>         > (tabulate_offfault.py,tabulate_onfaultdata.py, and
>         tabulate_ruptime.py)
>         > through creating the "scecfiles/tet4_200m" directory, I could get
>         > required results for SCEC TPV205.
>         > Thanks a lot for your support.
>         >
>         > I think "run_sim.py" file is to needed when a clustered
>         computer is
>         > used, as I got the following error when I run it;
>
>         Correct.
>
>         > _________________________________________
>         > *Also, /'can I use a non-planar fault geometry for a problem
>         similar
>         > with tpv205?/' And '/can I use different fault dip angles
>         (e.g.80 degree)?/'
>
>         Yes.
>
>         Brad
>
>     --
>     *Yasemin Korkusuz Öztürk*
>     Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
>     Kandilli Ras. & Dep. Arş. Ens.
>     Jeofizik Anabilim Dalı
>     34684, Çengelköy, İstanbul
>     Ofis: +90 216 516 33 78 <tel:+90%20216%20516%2033%2078>
>     Cep: +90 536 942 44 02 <tel:+90%20536%20942%2044%2002>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Yasemin Korkusuz Öztürk*
> Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
> Kandilli Ras. & Dep. Arş. Ens.
> Jeofizik Anabilim Dalı
> 34684, Çengelköy, İstanbul
> Ofis: +90 216 516 33 78
> Cep: +90 536 942 44 02