[CIG-SHORT] [EXTERNAL] Re: defining fault_edge nodes

Niloufar Abolfathian niloufar.abolfathian at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 09:05:46 PDT 2018


Hi,

My question is about how the cell numbers ‘topology/cells’ or [icells] are
correlated with the vertex coordinates.
I know what ‘geometry/vertices’ and
‘topology/cells’ are showing but I am not sure how the vertex coordinate of
each numbered vertex in ‘topology/cells’ is.
For example: in 3d hexagonal case I have  vertices 0,1,2,3,122,123,121,120
for a cell. Is the cooridnates of vertex 0, the first column of
‘geometry/vertices’ and so on?

Thanks,
Niloufar

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Charles Williams <willic3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Niloufar,
>
> If I’m understanding your question correctly, you need the
> ‘geometry/vertices’ field, which gives you the vertex coordinates, and you
> need the ‘topology/cells’ field, which gives you the vertices associated
> with each cell.  If you are filtering your results to the cell center, the
> cell center associated with each cell will just be the average of the
> vertex coordinates for the cell.  Remember that all indices are zero-based
> (rather than one-based as in Matlab).
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>
>
> On 30/06/2018, at 10:29 AM, Niloufar Abolfathian <
> niloufar.abolfathian at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had another question regarding reading the output files. I am using
> matlab for reading the h5 files and further plottings.
> For reading stress and strain related to each material I do have the
> stress/strain regarding each gird cell plus the topology information (only
> number of vertices not the geometrical values). I could not figure out how
> to relate the topology cells with the geometrical vertices.
>
> Thanks,
> Niloufar
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 6/21/18 5:50 PM, Niloufar Abolfathian wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Brad. By my second question, I mean in cases where the fault is
>>> extended to the external boundaries, and we want to set boundary conditions
>>> on these surfaces(external boundaries), fault nodes should be all excluded.
>>> Is this statement right?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that is correct.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov
>>> <mailto:baagaard at usgs.gov>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On 6/21/18 12:38 PM, Niloufar Abolfathian wrote:
>>>
>>>         Hi,
>>>
>>>         I am modeling a 3D vertical fault in an upper crust, lying on a
>>>         lower crust. It is as your 3d/hex example instead of that the
>>>         fault is only located in the upper crust.  I set up the nodes
>>>         related to the fault and fault_edge. From my meshing and node
>>>         selection the fault should only be located in the upper crust,
>>>         but after running the model the fault is extended below the
>>>         upper crust. I guess it may be due to the selection of fault and
>>>         fault_edge nodes. Hope you can help me with this issue.
>>>
>>>         Question: Should the fault_edge nodes be also included in fault
>>>         nodes? (I suppose the answer is yes, due to the figure 6.4 in
>>>         the manual.)
>>>         I tried excluding fault_edge nodes from the fault but then the
>>>         model will not be converged.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Yes. The fault edge nodes are included in the fault nodes.
>>>
>>>     The edge nodes are any buried edges of the fault. That is, any nodes
>>>     on edges that are not on the external domain boundary should be
>>>     included in the fault edges.
>>>
>>>         I have another question. In the example 3d/hex model, if we want
>>>         to define a boundary condition on y_neg/y_pos , the fault nodes
>>>         be excluded az z_neg, right?
>>>
>>>
>>>     I don't understand this question.
>>>
>>>     Regards,
>>>     Brad
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     CIG-SHORT mailing list
>>>     CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org <mailto:CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org>
>>>     http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short
>>>     <http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> CIG-SHORT mailing list
>> CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org
>> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SHORT mailing list
> CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short
>
>
>
> *Charles Williams I Geodynamic ModelerGNS Science **I** Te Pῡ Ao*
> 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon 5010, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand
> *Ph* 0064-4-570-4566 I *Mob* 0064-22-350-7326 I *Fax* 0064-4-570-4600
> *http://www.gns.cri.nz/* <http://www.gns.cri.nz/> *I* *Email: *
> *C.Williams at gns.cri.nz* <your.email at gns.cri.nz>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SHORT mailing list
> CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-short/attachments/20180702/9bb21329/attachment.html>


More information about the CIG-SHORT mailing list