% HOW TO CITE CONMAN % HowToCiteConMan.bib % % This file includes the bibtex entries necessary for citing ConMan. % % Citing software gives proper credit to those who contribute to the % development of the code and allows CIG to gather citation metrics % for our community. % % There are 3 parts to citing software: % I. Acknowledge CIG % II. Cite the code % III. Cite published papers % % I. ACKNOWLEDGE CIG % Use the following text in your “Acknowledgements”: % We thank the Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics (geodynamics.org) which is funded by the National Science Foundation under award EAR-0949446, EAR-1550901, and EAR-2149126 for making the code available. % II. CITE THE CODE % Select the proper code version from the following: % @software{conman-v3.0.0, author = {King, S. and Raefsky, A. and Hager, B.H.}, title = {ConMan version 3.0.0}, year = 2020, version = {v3.0.0}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.3633152}, organization = {Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics}, optkeywords = {ConMan} } @software{conman-v2.0.0, author = {King, S.D.}, title = {ConMan v2.0.0 [software]}, year = 2008, version = {v2.0.0}, doi = {NoDOI}, organization = {Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics}, optkeywords = {ConMan} } % III. CITE PUBLISHED PAPERS % Cite the following: % @article{, Title = {Conman: vectorizing a finite element code for incompressible two-dimensional convection in the Earth's mantle}, Author = {King, S.D. and Raefsky, A. and Hager, B.H.}, Journal = {Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors}, Year = {1990}, Pages = {195-207}, Volume = {59}, Number = {3}, optkeywords = {ConMan}, iSSN = {0031-9201}, doi = {10.1016/0031-9201(90)90225-M}, opturl = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/003192019090225M} } @article{https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04413.x, author = {King, Scott D. and Lee, Changyeol and Van Keken, Peter E. and Leng, Wei and Zhong, Shijie and Tan, Eh and Tosi, Nicola and Kameyama, Masanori C.}, title = {A community benchmark for 2-D Cartesian compressible convection in the Earth's mantle}, journal = {Geophysical Journal International}, volume = {180}, number = {1}, pages = {73-87}, keywords = {Numerical solutions, Numerical approximations and analysis, Equations of state, Dynamics of lithosphere and mantle}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04413.x}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04413.x}, eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04413.x}, abstract = {SUMMARY Benchmark comparisons are an essential tool to verify the accuracy and validity of computational approaches to mantle convection. Six 2-D Cartesian compressible convection codes are compared for steady-state constant and temperature-dependent viscosity cases as well as time-dependent constant viscosity cases. In general we find good agreement between all codes when comparing average flow characteristics such as Nusselt number and rms velocity. At Rayleigh numbers near 106 and dissipation numbers between 0 and 2, the results differ by approximately 1 per cent. Differences in discretization and use of finite volumes versus finite elements dominate the differences. There is a small systematic difference between the use of the anelastic liquid approximation (ALA) compared to that of the truncated ALA. In determining the onset of time-dependence, there was less agreement between the codes with a spread in the Rayleigh number where the first bifurcation occurs ranging from 7.79 × 105 to 1.05 × 106.}, year = {2010} }