[aspect-devel] Help needed with setting up an EBA benchmark
Wolfgang Bangerth
bangerth at tamu.edu
Thu Sep 4 17:18:14 PDT 2014
On 09/04/2014 07:09 PM, Katrina Arredondo wrote:
> But why does it need to be nondimensionalized? Just to be consistent
> with the benchmark?
It doesn't have to be. The benchmark is defined in terms of
nondimensional quantities -- it is what it is. But ASPECT does not take
Rayleigh and Dissipation numbers as inputs. I have to somehow translate
them into the physical quantities.
> I guess I was thinking that this could be a test for how "easy" it is
> to translate the geodynamics nondimensional terms into dimensional
> terms in ASPECT. Otherwise why have the dimensional terms at all, if
> it's too hard.
Because the real world is sufficiently complicated that
nondimensionalization does not work. (For example, what exactly is the
Rayleigh number when you have variable gravity, a geometry for which
there is no obvious lengthscale, and thermal expansion and viscosity
depend strongly on the temperature?) I think the better question is why
we should have the nondimensional form if it only describes idealized
but non-realistic situations :-)
Best
Wolfgang
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth at math.tamu.edu
www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/
More information about the Aspect-devel
mailing list