[cig-commits] commit: Spell check.

[Mercurial]

changeset:   166:e7764523491a
tag:         tip
user:        Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov>
date:        Thu Feb 07 08:46:25 2013 -0800
files:       faultRup.tex
description:
Spell check.


diff -r 7386281923cc -r e7764523491a faultRup.tex
--- a/faultRup.tex	Thu Feb 07 08:27:29 2013 -0800
+++ b/faultRup.tex	Thu Feb 07 08:46:25 2013 -0800
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ uncoupled equations. In this way the TSN
 uncoupled equations. In this way the TSN technique as described by
 \citet{Andrews:1999} could be considered an optimization of the domain
 decomposition technique for the special case of dynamic spontaneous
-rupture with a fault consitutitive model and explicit time stepping.
+rupture with a fault constitutive model and explicit time stepping.
 
 Imposing fault slip via double couple point sources involves imposing
 body forces consistent with an effective plastic strain associated
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ slip remains zero, and no adjustments to
 
 In iterating to find the fault slip and Lagrange multipliers that
 satisfy the fault constitutive model, we employ the following
-procedure.  We use this same procedure for all fault consitutive
+procedure.  We use this same procedure for all fault constitutive
 models, but it could be specialized to provide better performance
 depending on how the fault constitutive model depends on slip, slip
 rate, and various state variables. We first compute the perturbation
@@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ results against the analytical solution 
 \citet{Savage:Prescott:1978}. This problem consists of an infinitely
 long strike-slip fault in an elastic layer overlying a Maxwell
 viscoelastic half-space. The parameter files for this benchmark are
-available in the quasistatic/sceccrustdeform/savageprescott directory
+available in the quasi-static/sceccrustdeform/savageprescott directory
 of the benchmark repository. Figure~\ref{fig:savage:prescott::solution}
 illustrates the geometry of the problem with an exaggerated view of
 the deformation during the tenth earthquake cycle. Between earthquakes
@@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ time step size of five years. This time 
 time step size of five years. This time step corresponds to one tenth
 of the viscoelastic relaxation time; hence it tests the accuracy of
 the viscoelastic solution for moderately large time steps relative to
-the relaxation time. Recall that the quasti-static formulation does
+the relaxation time. Recall that the quasi-static formulation does
 not include inertial terms and time stepping is done via a series of
 static problems so that the accuracy depends only on the temporal
 variation of the boundary conditions and constitutive models.
@@ -2172,7 +2172,7 @@ VecMAXPY &    1 & 1.0 &   1819 \\
   hexahedral meshes and 12, 24, 48, and 96 processes. The performance
   for the tetrahedral meshes is nearly the same. For ideal scaling
   the time for each event should be constant as the number of
-  processes incrases. The \texttt{KSPSolve} event encompasses the
+  processes increases. The \texttt{KSPSolve} event encompasses the
   entire linear solve. \texttt{MatMult} corresponds to matrix-vector
   multiplications. \texttt{PCSetUp} and \texttt{PCApply} correspond to
   the setup and application of the AMG preconditioner.}