[cig-commits] commit: Fixed some typos.

[Mercurial]

changeset:   167:f66e7a77e6a8
tag:         tip
user:        Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov>
date:        Thu Feb 07 09:00:04 2013 -0800
files:       faultRup.tex response_jgr.tex
description:
Fixed some typos.


diff -r e7764523491a -r f66e7a77e6a8 faultRup.tex
--- a/faultRup.tex	Thu Feb 07 08:46:25 2013 -0800
+++ b/faultRup.tex	Thu Feb 07 09:00:04 2013 -0800
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ California, earthquakes. They employed s
 California, earthquakes. They employed spatial variation of the fault
 constitutive properties for Dieterich-Ruina rate-state friction to
 yield regions with stable sliding and regions with stick-slip
-behavior. This allows their numerical model to closely match the
+behavior. This allowed their numerical model to closely match the
 observed geodetic interseismic behavior as well as the slip pattern of
 the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Nevertheless, some aspects of the
 physical process, such as the 3-D nonplanar flower-structure geometry
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ relative to the negative side. Slip on t
 relative to the negative side. Slip on the fault also corresponds to
 equal and opposite tractions on the positive ($\bm{l_{+}}$) and negative
 ($\bm{l_{-}}$) sides of the fault, which we impose using Lagrange
-multipliers with $\bm{l}_{+} - \bm{l}_{-} = 0$.
+multipliers with $\bm{l}_{+} + \bm{l}_{-} = 0$.
 
 
 Recognizing that the tractions on the fault surface are analogous to
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ function and setting the integral over t
   \left(\bm{d} - \bm{u}_{+} + \bm{u}_{-} \right) \, dS = 0.
 \end{equation}\end{linenomath*}
 This constraint equation applies to the relative displacement vector
-across the fault and slip in both the tangential and fault opening
+across the fault and slip in the tangential and fault opening
 directions.
 
 The domain decomposition approach for imposing fault slip or tractions
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ rupture with a fault constitutive model 
 
 Imposing fault slip via double couple point sources involves imposing
 body forces consistent with an effective plastic strain associated
-with fault slip (sometimes called the ``stress-free strain'',
-\citet{Aki:Richards:2002}). The total strain is the superposition of
+with fault slip (sometimes called the ``stress-free strain''
+\citep{Aki:Richards:2002}). The total strain is the superposition of
 this effective plastic strain and the elastic strain. The fault
 tractions are associated with the total strain, not the effective
 plastic strain. This illustrates a key difference between this
diff -r e7764523491a -r f66e7a77e6a8 response_jgr.tex
--- a/response_jgr.tex	Thu Feb 07 08:46:25 2013 -0800
+++ b/response_jgr.tex	Thu Feb 07 09:00:04 2013 -0800
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
   suffer the shortcoming claimed by Reviewer \#2. We added some
   additional discussion (see details under Reviewer \#2 response) to
   clarify how our implementation is similar to the often used
-  ``Traction at Split Node'' (TSN) implementation and differs from a
+  ``traction at split node'' (TSN) implementation and differs from a
   double couple point source implementation.
 }%
 
@@ -489,8 +489,8 @@
   To clarify this distinction, we added two paragraphs (lines
   150--165) discussing the similarities and differences between our
   domain decomposition approach using Lagrange multipliers and other
-  methods of implementing fault slip, including ``Traction at Split
-  Nodes'' and double couple point sources.
+  methods of implementing fault slip, including ``traction at split
+  nodes'' and double couple point sources.
 }%
 
 \comment{%