[cig-commits] [commit] master: Added Rene's replacement text (56388bd)

[cig_noreply at geodynamics.org]

Repository : https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect

On branch  : master
Link       : https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/compare/44ed2e9846c19f03a8e1f451b1e0a40e3f97d3f1...06efd8e2f3e875c87ad705d60f577de9e7bf96ea

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit 56388bdf4d9fe39751f8eaea984745d07e7b7b53
Author: Ryan Grove <rgrove at clemson.edu>
Date:   Fri Jan 30 12:17:02 2015 -0500

    Added Rene's replacement text


>---------------------------------------------------------------

56388bdf4d9fe39751f8eaea984745d07e7b7b53
 doc/manual/manual.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/manual/manual.tex b/doc/manual/manual.tex
index c7fe1e8..579f288 100644
--- a/doc/manual/manual.tex
+++ b/doc/manual/manual.tex
@@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ of the material: more damage means lower viscosity because the rocks are weaker.
 In cases like this, there is only a single compositional field and it is not
 in permanent equilibrium. Consequently, the increment implementations of
 material models in \aspect{} need to compute is typically the rate $q(T,c)$
-times the time step.  In other words, if you want your reaction term to be a rate, you need to multiply by the time step size.
+times the time step.  In other words, if you compute a reaction rate inside the material model you need to multiply it by the time step size before returning the value.
 
 Compositional fields have proven to be surprisingly versatile tools to model
 all sorts of components of models that go beyond the simple Stokes plus