[CIG-SEISMO] SPECFEM3D - Problem with creating topography with mesh_mount.py

emanuele casarotti emanuele.casarotti at gmail.com
Sun Jul 7 16:50:03 PDT 2013


Hi Shahar,

1) it could be important especially if the boundaries of  topography
doesn't coincide with the boundaries of the volume.
2)
http://www.geodynamics.org/wsvn/cig/seismo/3D/GEOCUBIT/trunk/?#a41af1a23f02657a972f9d0b9bb1d6fcc



On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Shahar Barak <shaharb at stanford.edu> wrote:

> 1/ Why does the size of the volume makes a difference?
> 2/ Where can I find Geocubit? I don't see anything on the website except a
> powerpoint presentation. What exactly is it? is there documentation on how
> to use it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shahar
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:04 PM, emanuele casarotti <
> emanuele.casarotti at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi shahar
>>
>> Yes i believe that the problem could occur from the side of your topo...
>>
>> I see 2 options
>> 1) decrease the size of the big volume that intersect the topo
>> 2) take a look at geocubit package (cig seismo 3D repository) expecially
>> if you plan to refine the topo
>>
>> Emanuele
>>
>> Il giorno 07/lug/2013, alle ore 23:54, Shahar Barak <shaharb at stanford.edu>
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> Cubit ver 13.2. File attached.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Shahar
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, emanuele casarotti <
>> emanuele.casarotti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you show your journal file and the version of cubit that you are
>>> using?
>>>
>>> Emanuele
>>>
>>> Il giorno 07/lug/2013, alle ore 17:45, Shahar Barak <
>>> shaharb at stanford.edu> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using mesh_mount.py from the Mount St Helens example in SPECFEM3D to
>>> create a mesh with topography, but at a different location.
>>> The problem is that after the Imprint All command the volume
>>> isn't separated into the above topography and below topography. I don't get
>>> any error messages.
>>> Does anyone have experience with this? Any ideas what might be the
>>> problem?
>>> Is it possible that the problem is that the topography at the edges it
>>> to rugged?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Shahar
>>>
>>>
>>> Shahar Barak
>>> =======================================
>>> Crustal Geophysics Research Group
>>> Department of Geophysics, Stanford University
>>> 397 Panama Mall, Stanford CA 94305-2215
>>> Mitchell Building, room 463
>>> Office: (650) 725 8229
>>> Cell: (650) 276 6169
>>> shaharb at stanford.edu*
>>> *
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>>> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>>> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>>
>>
>> <create_mesh.py>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-seismo/attachments/20130708/4e634f45/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CIG-SEISMO mailing list