[CIG-SEISMO] MINEOS synthetic amplitudes

Elliott Sales de Andrade esalesde at physics.utoronto.ca
Tue Apr 15 16:22:24 PDT 2014


Hi Dimitri,

Would you be able to check this improved code into git? There's little 
point in having an "official" repository if people need to go elsewhere 
to get the best/working code.

On 21/02/14 07:05 AM, Dimitri Komatitsch wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I think Li Zhao in Taiwan has fixed some of the problems and developed
> an improved version called "Mineos2007".
>
> Best regards,
> Dimitri.
>
> On 21/02/2014 06:54, Carl Tape wrote:
>> Ciao Ana!
>>
>> I hope you are doing well!
>>
>> I'm happy to hear some positive support for MINEOS. Within CIG we are
>> wondering how to move forward to establish a "better" modes code.
>> Frederick Simons and a student had a pretty torturous experience with
>> MINEOS, and he sent some details explaining the challenges. From an
>> outsider's standpoint, there appears to be no development at all  with
>> the code, which is not a good sign. David Al-Attar believes that the
>> best approach would be to start from scratch, relying heavily on various
>> components. He found the code extremely hard to follow and adapt. Have
>> you ever found the need for modifications or improvements?
>>
>> Anyway, I am sorry to miss "the" John event next month. It will be a
>> tremendous event, I can see from the list of participants. Hopefully
>> there will be some informal discussion about the best way to improve
>> MINEOS or establish a new modes code.
>>
>> (On a related note, AXISEM will be useful to all, but we still want a
>> "proven" and adaptable modes code!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Carl
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>
>


-- 
Elliott Sales de Andrade
University of Toronto (Physics)


More information about the CIG-SEISMO mailing list