[CIG-SEISMO] MINEOS synthetic amplitudes

[Dimitri Komatitsch]

Dear Li,

Thank you very much for your answer. Let me send your Mineos2007 source 
code to CIG then. It will be very helpful to the community I think.

Thank you,
Best wishes,

Dimitri.

On 16/04/2014 03:09, Li Zhao wrote:
> Hello Dimitri,
>
> There is no problem at all to check all or any part of the codes
> in Mineos2007 into the CIG repository. I have a more recent version,
> but it'd take me some time to collect all the relevant codes
> (both non-MPI and MPI versions). The differences with the 2007
> version are mostly in the auxiliary codes, not in mineos.f.
> There is not much one can do to mineos.f. What we can do is to
> refine the auxiliary codes so that mineos.f can be run more
> efficiently and smoothly, and also the subsequent mode summation
> more conveniently.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Li
>
>
>
>> Dimitri Komatitsch" <komatitsch at lma.cnrs-mrs.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Elliott,
>>
>> I have a copy of Li's Mineos2007 code, but let me cc Li because we need
>> to check with him if the license he uses permits that, and also check if
>> he has an even more recent version.
>>
>> Li, when you have time could you give us an update on the status of your
>> version of Mineos?
>> (CIG is a great site that, among other things, gathers a lot of open
>> source software for geophysics: http://geodynamics.org/cig/software/ ;
>> it is the site where we maintain SPECFEM for instance)
>>
>> I also cc David Al-Attar, just in case he has another version of Mineos.
>>
>> To all: we are trying to see if a single, "official" version of Mineos
>> could be maintained on the CIG web site, to avoid the current situation
>> in which different groups have different versions and have improved
>> several parts independently.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Dimitri.
>>
>>
>> On 16/04/2014 01:22, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
>>> Hi Dimitri,
>>>
>>> Would you be able to check this improved code into git? There's little
>>> point in having an "official" repository if people need to go elsewhere
>>> to get the best/working code.
>>>
>>> On 21/02/14 07:05 AM, Dimitri Komatitsch wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I think Li Zhao in Taiwan has fixed some of the problems and developed
>>>> an improved version called "Mineos2007".
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Dimitri.
>>>>
>>>> On 21/02/2014 06:54, Carl Tape wrote:
>>>>> Ciao Ana!
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope you are doing well!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm happy to hear some positive support for MINEOS. Within CIG we are
>>>>> wondering how to move forward to establish a "better" modes code.
>>>>> Frederick Simons and a student had a pretty torturous experience with
>>>>> MINEOS, and he sent some details explaining the challenges. From an
>>>>> outsider's standpoint, there appears to be no development at all  with
>>>>> the code, which is not a good sign. David Al-Attar believes that the
>>>>> best approach would be to start from scratch, relying heavily on various
>>>>> components. He found the code extremely hard to follow and adapt. Have
>>>>> you ever found the need for modifications or improvements?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I am sorry to miss "the" John event next month. It will be a
>>>>> tremendous event, I can see from the list of participants. Hopefully
>>>>> there will be some informal discussion about the best way to improve
>>>>> MINEOS or establish a new modes code.
>>>>>
>>>>> (On a related note, AXISEM will be useful to all, but we still want a
>>>>> "proven" and adaptable modes code!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Carl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CIG-SEISMO mailing list
>>>>> CIG-SEISMO at geodynamics.org
>>>>> http://geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-seismo
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dimitri Komatitsch
>> CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS), Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics,
>> UPR 7051, Marseille, France    http://komatitsch.free.fr
>>

-- 
Dimitri Komatitsch
CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS), Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics,
UPR 7051, Marseille, France    http://komatitsch.free.fr