[CIG-SHORT] X&Y coordinates in fault spatialdb files
Pierre Sakic
pierre.sakic at univ-lr.fr
Tue Dec 9 05:56:07 PST 2014
Dear all,
I ask myself about the importance of the X parameters which define the
locked and unlocked zones in the fault.spatialdb files.
I'm working with a 2D model
Is it better to keep it at 0 and define the locked zone only with the Y (as
in the subduction example given), or is it more rigorous to find the right
X associated with each Y on the slab ?
Is there a risk of crash to keep the X = 0 ?
And another annex, question, do the Y boundary can be sharp like :
y slip
- 60 0.0
- 60 -2.0
or it have to be progressive :
y slip
- 60 0.0
- 70 -2.0
Thanks for your help,
PS
--
Pierre Sakic
Chercheur Doctorant - Géodésie/Géophysique
Ingénieur Géomaticien
Labo. LIENSs - UMR 7266 - La Rochelle (FR)
Tel : 0033 (0)5 46 50 76 54
Port : 0033 (0)6 82 70 81 43
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-short/attachments/20141209/6ee86140/attachment.html>
More information about the CIG-SHORT
mailing list