[CIG-SHORT] Can PyLith work with GLIBC version 2.12 ?

[Josimar Alves da Silva]

Brad,

Thank you so much. It is clear now.

Best,
Josimar

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov> wrote:

> Josimar,
>
> Only the PyLith binaries (which are not intended for use on a cluster)
> have limited GLIBC compatibility. If you build from source, then the only
> restrictions are that the dependencies (e.g., HDF5, PETSc, and NetCDF) be
> versions with interfaces compatible with the calls from PyLith. This
> compatibility is insured if you use the PyLith Installer utility to build
> from source.
>
> Regards,
> Brad
>
>
>
> On 05/26/2017 09:54 AM, Josimar Alves da Silva wrote:
>
>> Dear PyLith developers,
>>
>> I would like to build PyLith version 2.2.0 from source  on  a computer
>> cluster, however it seems that the latest version for GLIBC available is
>> the version 2.12.
>>
>> It seems that PyLith version 2.2.0 requires GLIBC with version 2.14 or
>> later.
>>
>> If I build PyLith version 2.2.0 and use the older version of GLIBC
>> (2.12), would this cause any issues for the users simulations or for PyLith
>> general behavior  ?
>>
>> Please feel free to suggest other workarounds, note that I can't update
>> the GLIBC version.
>>
>> thank you,
>> Josimar
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CIG-SHORT mailing list
>> CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org
>> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CIG-SHORT mailing list
> CIG-SHORT at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cig-short
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-short/attachments/20170526/b1a8eee0/attachment.html>