[aspect-devel] Boundary composition

John Naliboff jbnaliboff at ucdavis.edu
Thu Sep 29 10:25:06 PDT 2016


Hi Lev,

Hmmm,.  I have not used this option in a few weeks, let me make sure it 
still works on my end.

Did you change the number of compositional fields to correspond to the 
number in your model?  My example had four compositional fields.

Cheers,
John

*************************************************
John Naliboff
Assistant Project Scientist, CIG
Earth & Planetary Sciences Dept., UC Davis

On 09/29/2016 05:14 AM, Lev Karatun wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> thank you for the suggestion. When I tried to use the option (using 
> the latest versions of dealII and aspect) I got a segfault unfortunately:
>
> MXM: Got signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
> ==== backtrace ====
>     0  /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x326a0) [0x7fffe7b8b6a0]
>     1 
>  /home/r/russ/lkaratun/aspect/dealiidev/lib/libdeal_II.so.8.5.0-pre(_ZNK6dealii12CellAccessorILi3ELi3EE29neighbor_of_neighbor_internalEj+0x55) 
> [0x7ffff
> 6bb1715]
>     2 
>  /home/r/russ/lkaratun/aspect/dealiidev/lib/libdeal_II.so.8.5.0-pre(+0x3a736cc) 
> [0x7ffff60f76cc]
>     3 
>  ../aspect(_ZN6aspect9SimulatorILi3EE19setup_system_matrixERKSt6vectorIN6dealii8IndexSetESaIS4_EE+0x6ff) 
> [0xb059cf]
>     4  ../aspect(_ZN6aspect9SimulatorILi3EE10setup_dofsEv+0x414) 
> [0xb293e4]
>     5  ../aspect(_ZN6aspect9SimulatorILi3EE3runEv+0x1d6) [0xb29996]
>     6  ../aspect(main+0x1a9) [0x865f59]
>     7  /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7fffe7b77d5d]
>     8  ../aspect() [0x7ca27d]
>
>
> Best regards,
> Lev Karatun.
>
> 2016-09-28 12:58 GMT-04:00 John Naliboff <jbnaliboff at ucdavis.edu 
> <mailto:jbnaliboff at ucdavis.edu>>:
>
>     Hi Lev,
>
>     Initial composition would be the correct boundary choice for what
>     you are trying to do.
>
>     One thing that may help is to use the discontinuous composition
>     discretization option, if you have not tried it already.  This
>     helps tracks compositional field boundaries more accurately
>     through time and removes compositional field diffusion effects. 
>     Certainly helped with some of the models I am running.
>
>     Below is a section from a .prm file where I use this option.  FYI,
>     you will want to use the development version of dealii (master
>     branch from Github) if you use the discontinuous composition
>     discretization option. The model will run with dealii version
>     8.4.1, but the development version helps reduce the memory
>     requirements dramatically.
>
>     If this option helps, please let us know.
>
>     Cheers,
>     John
>
>     *************************************************
>     John Naliboff
>     Assistant Project Scientist, CIG
>     Earth & Planetary Sciences Dept., UC Davis
>     **
>
>     *# Use disccontinous composition bound preserving limiter*
>     *subsection Discretization*
>     *set Use discontinuous composition discretization = true*
>     *subsection Stabilization parameters*
>     *set Use limiter for discontinuous composition solution = true #
>     apply the limiter to the DG solutions*
>     *set Global composition maximum = 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0*
>     *set Global composition minimum = 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0*
>     *end*
>     *end*
>
>     On 09/27/2016 01:09 PM, Lev Karatun wrote:
>>     Hi,
>>     I'm doing a lithospheric scale convergence model, imposing influx
>>     (along the x axis) at the top half of the side walls (y=0, YMAX),
>>     and outflux at the bottom half. Over the course of the
>>     simulation, the lithosphere at the side of the model (the part
>>     that was injected) gets progressively thinner. The vertical (z)
>>     and lateral (y) velocities are set to zero at the boundary, but I
>>     noticed that a lateral flow is still happening very close to the
>>     side wall, and my guess is that due to the material mixing the
>>     outermost cells don't consist of lithoshperic material anymore,
>>     but only of, let's say, 80% lithospheric and 20% mantle. So the
>>     question is: is it possible to manually restrict the incoming
>>     material to be of the same properties as it was in the outer
>>     cells at the beginning of the simulation (as opposed to the
>>     previous time step, which as fast as I understand is defining the
>>     material right now -- correct me if I'm wrong). Also, I was
>>     wondering if parameters in section Boundary composition model are
>>     related to this? I tried setting Model name to "initial
>>     composition" but it didn't seem to change anything.
>>     Thanks in advance.
>>     Best regards,
>>     Lev Karatun.
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Aspect-devel mailing list
>>     Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org <mailto:Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org>
>>     http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>>     <http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel>
>     _______________________________________________ Aspect-devel
>     mailing list Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
>     <mailto:Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org>
>     http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>     <http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing list
> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/aspect-devel/attachments/20160929/23675412/attachment.html>


More information about the Aspect-devel mailing list