[aspect-devel] Boundary composition

Lev Karatun lev.karatun at gmail.com
Thu Sep 29 11:12:04 PDT 2016


Hi John,

ok, thanks. Yes, I did -- it swore at me when I tried to run the simulation
without doing it =)

Best regards,
Lev Karatun.

2016-09-29 13:25 GMT-04:00 John Naliboff <jbnaliboff at ucdavis.edu>:

> Hi Lev,
>
> Hmmm,.  I have not used this option in a few weeks, let me make sure it
> still works on my end.
>
> Did you change the number of compositional fields to correspond to the
> number in your model?  My example had four compositional fields.
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> *************************************************
> John Naliboff
> Assistant Project Scientist, CIG
> Earth & Planetary Sciences Dept., UC Davis
>
> On 09/29/2016 05:14 AM, Lev Karatun wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> thank you for the suggestion. When I tried to use the option (using the
> latest versions of dealII and aspect) I got a segfault unfortunately:
>
> MXM: Got signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
> ==== backtrace ====
>     0  /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x326a0) [0x7fffe7b8b6a0]
>     1  /home/r/russ/lkaratun/aspect/dealiidev/lib/libdeal_II.so.8.
> 5.0-pre(_ZNK6dealii12CellAccessorILi3ELi3EE29neighbor_of_neighbor_internalEj+0x55)
> [0x7ffff
> 6bb1715]
>     2  /home/r/russ/lkaratun/aspect/dealiidev/lib/libdeal_II.so.8.5.0-pre(+0x3a736cc)
> [0x7ffff60f76cc]
>     3  ../aspect(_ZN6aspect9SimulatorILi3EE19setup_system_
> matrixERKSt6vectorIN6dealii8IndexSetESaIS4_EE+0x6ff) [0xb059cf]
>     4  ../aspect(_ZN6aspect9SimulatorILi3EE10setup_dofsEv+0x414)
> [0xb293e4]
>     5  ../aspect(_ZN6aspect9SimulatorILi3EE3runEv+0x1d6) [0xb29996]
>     6  ../aspect(main+0x1a9) [0x865f59]
>     7  /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7fffe7b77d5d]
>     8  ../aspect() [0x7ca27d]
>
>
> Best regards,
> Lev Karatun.
>
> 2016-09-28 12:58 GMT-04:00 John Naliboff <jbnaliboff at ucdavis.edu>:
>
>> Hi Lev,
>>
>> Initial composition would be the correct boundary choice for what you are
>> trying to do.
>>
>> One thing that may help is to use the discontinuous composition
>> discretization option, if you have not tried it already.  This helps tracks
>> compositional field boundaries more accurately through time and removes
>> compositional field diffusion effects.  Certainly helped with some of the
>> models I am running.
>>
>> Below is a section from a .prm file where I use this option.  FYI, you
>> will want to use the development version of dealii (master branch from
>> Github) if you use the discontinuous composition discretization option.
>> The model will run with dealii version 8.4.1, but the development version
>> helps reduce the memory requirements dramatically.
>>
>> If this option helps, please let us know.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John
>>
>> *************************************************
>> John Naliboff
>> Assistant Project Scientist, CIG
>> Earth & Planetary Sciences Dept., UC Davis
>>
>> *# Use disccontinous composition bound preserving limiter**subsection Discretization**  set Use discontinuous composition discretization = true**  subsection Stabilization parameters**      set Use limiter for discontinuous composition solution = true # apply the limiter to the DG solutions**      set Global composition maximum = 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0**      set Global composition minimum = 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0**  end**end*
>>
>> On 09/27/2016 01:09 PM, Lev Karatun wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm doing a lithospheric scale convergence model, imposing influx (along
>> the x axis) at the top half of the side walls (y=0, YMAX), and outflux at
>> the bottom half. Over the course of the simulation, the lithosphere at the
>> side of the model (the part that was injected) gets progressively thinner.
>> The vertical (z) and lateral (y) velocities are set to zero at the
>> boundary, but I noticed that a lateral flow is still happening very close
>> to the side wall, and my guess is that due to the material mixing the
>> outermost cells don't consist of lithoshperic material anymore, but only
>> of, let's say, 80% lithospheric and 20% mantle. So the question is: is it
>> possible to manually restrict the incoming material to be of the same
>> properties as it was in the outer cells at the beginning of the simulation
>> (as opposed to the previous time step, which as fast as I understand is
>> defining the material right now -- correct me if I'm wrong). Also, I was
>> wondering if parameters in section Boundary composition model are related
>> to this? I tried setting Model name to "initial composition" but it didn't
>> seem to change anything.
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Best regards,
>> Lev Karatun.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aspect-devel mailing listAspect-devel at geodynamics.orghttp://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Aspect-devel mailing
>> list Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org http://lists.geodynamics.org/c
>> gi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing listAspect-devel at geodynamics.orghttp://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aspect-devel mailing list
> Aspect-devel at geodynamics.org
> http://lists.geodynamics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aspect-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geodynamics.org/pipermail/aspect-devel/attachments/20160929/e52fd95e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Aspect-devel mailing list