Get credit for your research code with the Journal of Open Source Software

It’s hard to imagine doing research in 2020 without relying on software. Almost every task, from data acquisition and data processing to modeling and visualization, involves a software component. The rise of open-source software in science has empowered generations of researchers to build upon the work of others like never before. But the credit and incentive systems of academia have failed to keep up. Researchers investing large portions of their time building and maintaining crucial open-source software often find themselves lagging behind their peers in terms of academic currency: papers and citations. 

The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS; https://joss.theoj.org) was created to solve this problem. It’s a developer-friendly journal that publishes papers about research software, providing credit to developers in the form of a citable paper. JOSS is far from your average journal:

• A JOSS paper does not duplicate (or substitute for) the software documentation. In fact, preparing the paper should take no more than a few hours if you’ve already invested in writing documentation. 

• Reviewers of JOSS submissions review the source code and development process too, not just the paper. 

• The JOSS review has the goal of collaboratively and openly improving the quality of the submission to the point where the submission is accepted, not merely passing judgment. Reviewers and editors often submit issues and pull requests to the software repository and work with authors so that the submission improves until it meets the required criteria.

• The review takes place on a platform familiar to many software developers: GitHub (with the help of our trusty bot Whedon). The whole process should be familiar to anyone who has commented on a GitHub issue.

To get a sense of the JOSS review process, ... [full article]

Contributed by The Joss Editorial Team